Coronavirus- the scam

Coronavirus - the scam - we’ve been here before...

Ladies and gentlemen, you weren’t listening in the 1980’s when President Thabo Mbeki  of South Africa called a whole lot of the “science” into question regarding that old chestnut HIV.

And now here we are again.
Mbeki was right, by the way - right to question the bogus HIV test, the toxic meds and right to have his then health minister Manto Tshabalala Msimang investigate the HIV-AIDS panic and “claimed” pandemic that was apparently rife in that country.

It wasn’t - it never happened - but yes, people did die.

Mostly from the meds that were forced on the government and by default, on victims (I choose the word carefully) - not patients, victims.
Msimang, that unfortunate health minister was vindicated posthumously as well - the man who started the whole HIV scam (yes, it was a scam - still is) one, Luc Montagnier (later to receive a Nobel prize in medicine for this “work”) admitted that, contrary to his original assertions about HIV and its incurability and its inevitable and ultimate progression to immune suppression and death, that one could, in fact, not only live with the virus but that with proper nutrition, vitamins, clean water & sanitation (i.e. NOT impoverished living conditions and what Msimang had been saying all along), one could actually “cure it”.  He said this on camera circa 2002, decades after he’d been lauded by the establishment for his isolation of HIV (which he never actually did) - long after he’d received millions as his percentage of the HIV testing kit sales (in concert with his pal, Robert Gallo in the US) and, of course, long after the pharmaceutical industry had made (probably) trillions from the sales of those test kits and the antiretroviral meds they sold to purportedly manage the symptoms of AIDS.

What is significant in this story is that despite numerous exposés of this scam, it has never been widely accepted by the public because the medical establishment (read: Big Pharma) through the power of the media, torpedoed every attempt by the truth-tellers (labelled dissidents or HIV-denialists) to build the story.
Journalists, scientists and other professionals were lambasted if they drifted off the reservation (that is, promoted the scientific truth about the fraud) and this is now rearing its head in precisely the same way with coronavirus. The difference being, of course, this may affect you not just gay men or impoverished Africans as was the case with HIV, a very tricky and selective virus, behaving like no other virus has ever done or is likely to do again.  No, with coronavirus, that’s something transmitted by ordinary people in public through an airborne pathogen. No dirty gay sex or poor black people to contend with - someone on the bus or at the airport might randomly infect you - oh my God! 

And they have isolated the pathogen right? I mean they have to in order to test for virus to empirically diagnose that people actually have it, right? Well, yes, that’s what one has to do to prove the existence of a virus and then build a test that actually tests for that virus.

At least,  it’s what they are required to do scientifically for it to be valid but it ain’t what they’re doing - this is the old HIV-soft-shoe-shuffle yet again. But on a much grander scale (if we buy into it and let the bullshit blossom unchecked.)

To explain:

Step  1: Create a virus but don’t necessarily do it scientifically.

They did this with HIV - nobody has ever isolated the virus - even the original claimant (Montagnier) later admitted this was never achieved. Every electromicrographic representation of the “virus” is bogus.

What really got HIV up and running, however, wasn’t science - it was the media. Once the HIV “sample” had crossed the Atlantic from France to the US, one Prof Robert Gallo (circa April 1984) backed by the US NIH (National Institutes of Health) called a press-conference to make the startling pronouncement that he had “discovered” the thing that was causing fatal immune-suppression in certain cohorts of gay men in the US, that it was a virus and it was called the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and that he believed it was sexually transmitted - etc. etc. etc. The rest, as they say....

There was supposed to be a scientific paper published by Gallo supporting this claim - that he had isolated pure virus - truth is, he never did. The paper was there but it didn’t hold up as nobody could replicate the work and Montagnier was ready to sue Gallo and the US government for stealing his work and his thunder.

No worries though, they (France and the US) decided to share the accolades and, of course the spoils - a testing kit and drugs loomed large in the trans-Atlantic event horizon. 

Happening in the background was a groundswell from a cohort of respected scientists and virologists and journalists (even lawyers in South Africa) that the science associated with all of these claims was spurious in the extreme and didn’t hold up under any form of scrutiny but since the media had got hold of and released Gallo’s story (that’s all it was), panic in the gay fast-track community was feverish. 

The noise from that community and the public, who are always scared of a new virus, especially when the media is ramping up the hysteria regarding infection etc. was much louder than any dissident voices no matter how credentialed they may have been, Nobel laureates among them.

It was too late - the HIV media train was up and running globally and there was no stopping it. Any of this sounding familiar yet?

Step 2: Provide a testing methodology to detect infection.

Enter: the (so-called) AIDS test which didn’t then and never has tested for viral particles. As HIV had never been purified and test animals had never been successfully infected to replicate the same illness, there was no valid way of producing a testing methodology that could detect virus in a blood sample but hey, no problem to Bob and Luc - they came up with an ingenious alternative - a test that could (sort of) identify a biological marker that could (they claimed) be associated with the virus - in their case - a protein, in fact an antibody - yes, one of the things that actually protects the body from viral attack. It was claimed (spuriously if one reads the test-kit literature) that the presence of HIV (even though the kit didn’t detect the virus itself) could be linked to this protein and thus by association, a positive reading meant that you were likely to have HIV. But to be safe (and fair play to the US & France - such nice guys) they called for a second confirmatory test which, if positive, dictated a third and final test (using a different methodology but still no viral detection) and only then would the patient be deemed HIV+ if that test again confirmed the presence of the hapless protein, which, it has to be said, does seem to be present when an immune system is compromised or hard at work but to make the quantum leap to pin this on HIV, is total hit-and-hope nonsense.

The problems are manifold - firstly, it was assumed that only HIV lit up this test positively but over 70 common conditions ranging from the flu to pregnancy to malaria to hepatitis - also returned positive readings on the test - false ones. And the establishment being what it is, may have started with benign and benevolent intentions but pretty soon no 2nd and/or 3rd test was being done - just one test, a positive reading which could have been pregnancy, a cold, flu or maybe you were just run down but NO - HIV did this - you are HIV+ you filthy dirty gay or black person (delete that which is not applicable) and you are going to die.

Okay so now we have 2 conditions fulfilled (not of Koch’s Postulates - the gold standard for viral determination) but of the bogus virus hoedown - we have announced there is a virus - haven’t isolated it yet despite that we have a testing kit that allegedly diagnoses the virus that we haven’t isolated. Champion. - let’s keep rolling. 

Step 3: Build a data base using the testing results  - yes, we know it could be building a database of positive results that have absolutely nothing to do with a virus but hey - it’s starting to look more profitable by the day. In no time at all infections stats are released through the WHO (spurious as they may well be) and now they can get to use a word nobody had ever heard of before the 1980’s - PANDEMIC - this isn’t just a common-or-garden epidemic - this is worldwide pandemic proportionality. 

And, it has to be said, the Internet hadn’t come online while this was happening - no it hasn’t always been there folks , it got feet properly after 1989. So the media weren’t quite as efficient then but they did have TV at their disposal and boy did they use that.

Repeat the bullshit on the news ad-nauseam  - AIDS is a pandemic, it is sexually transmitted, everyone is at risk and you should be tested just to be safe. No mention of the non-specificity of the test of course and that you might very likely be misdiagnosed.  

The fearmongering was rampant. 

Step 4: Get the infected people on meds ASAP.

And here was the most insidious ploy of all - the meds. They were demonstrably dangerous - so-called antiretroviral (ARV) chemotherapy medications from AZT to ddi to nevirapine and other horrific cell-destroying compounds, some of which (in the case of AZT) had been shelved as a cancer treatment having been found to be too profoundly toxic. No problem for gays and blacks though - they were dying of compromised immune systems anyway so what the hell...

Thing was, these cocktails of drugs induced the very symptoms of the condition they were purportedly treating by compromising the immune system even more, which, when under further attack produced whatever antigens it could to try and protect itself, very often to no avail. The mortality rate of gay men “infected” with AIDS in the US, skyrocketed when AZT was introduced but it was no problem to make the assumption that death was caused by the AIDS rather than the toxic drugs they were being fed. Ergo: the pandemic and the (bogus) statistics continued to grow. As did the fear of this syndrome and, of course, the virus.

It was in the media and on the internet - Wikipedia even - it HAD to be true...

Tens of thousands of people who elected to ignore the nonsense and follow a pathway of lifestyle change, healthy eating and avoidance of ARV treatment, have lived and continue to live normal, healthy lives. The attrition rate of those on ARV’s can be seen through any cursory investigation into this narrative, which I urge you to do.

But the establishment and Wikipedia will continue to defend the HIV scam to the bitter end, now promoting prophylactic meds for HIV and a vaccine, which is usually the ultimate endgame but the entire narrative is built on a pack of lies, now relegated to the history of the condition - Mbeki, Msimang and the dissidents who exposed this fraud, were right then and they will, one day be vindicated in history when the truth comes out. A footnote to the above tragedy is that despite profiting from the HIV (sic) test kits all over the world, it was deemed (by that illustrious body, the WHO) that testing in remote sectors of Africa wasn’t necessary, a symptomatic diagnosis (euphemistically referred to as the Bangui definition of AIDS) was acceptable and a clinician could merely observe a patient for a number of days and if 3 or more noted conditions (common among impoverished Africans without access to proper water and sanitation), a diagnosis of AIDS (i.e. being HIV+) could be registered and a regime of ARV treatment could ensue - more vague guesswork and more deaths and more HIV+ fatalities... you see the picture emerging here, right...

Fast forward to today, coronavirus and we have a reprise of the story above with the notable exception that the potential victims are not just sexually actively gay people or impoverished Africans - but the narrative is exactly the same.

There has been no viral isolation - just claims of a new strain of corona and there is certainly no virus testing kit but we have heard that  (the meds) a vaccine is on its way or has already been formulated. These guys are getting good at this but we are still the same stupid gullible people swallowing the bullshit by the bucketload. 

David Crowe has been through the HIV scam with a fine-tooth comb and has come out the other side still blazing away with supportable science behind him and thanks to him (and the efforts of others) thousands of people diagnosed as having this virus, have avoided or gone off the ARV’s and that has literally saved their lives. These initiatives continue unabated in the interest of public information and health. 

The detailed extract of what I have placed below can be found at the link: https://www.dropbox.com/s/wy96pf3bmyl0fwd/CoronavirusPanic.pdf?dl=0

He writes: 

“Virus Existence

Scientists are detecting novel RNA in multiple patients with pneumonia-like conditions, and are assuming that the detection of RNA (which is believed to be wrapped in proteins to form an RNA virus, as coronaviruses are believed to be) is equivalent to isolation of the virus. It is not, and one of the groups of scientists was honest enough to admit this:

“we did not perform tests for detecting infectious virus in blood” 

But, despite this admission, earlier in the paper they repeatedly referred to the 41 cases (out of 59 similar cases) that tested positive for this RNA as, “41 patients... confirmed to be infected with 2019-nCoV19 

Another paper quietly admitted that:

“our study does not fulfill Koch’s postulates” 

Koch’s postulates, first stated by the great German bacteriologist Robert Koch in the late 1800s, can simply be stated as:

• Purify the pathogen (e.g. virus) from many cases with a particular illness.

• Expose susceptible animals (obviously not humans) to the pathogen.

• Verify that the same illness is produced.

• Some add that you should also re-purify the pathogen, just to be sure that it

really is creating the illness.

Famous virologist Thomas Rivers stated in a 1936 speech, “It is obvious that Koch's postulates have not been satisfied in viral diseases”. That was a long time ago, but the same problem still continues. None of the papers referenced in this article have even attempted to purify the virus. And the word ‘isolation’ has been so debased by virologists it means nothing (e.g. adding impure materials to a cell culture and seeing cell death is ‘isolation’).

Reference [1] did publish electron micrographs, but it can clearly be seen in the lesser magnified photo, that the particles believed to be coronavirus are not purified as the quantity of material that is cellular is much greater. The paper notes that the photos are from “human airway epithelial cells”. Also consider that the photo included in the article will certainly be the “best” photo, i.e. the one with the greatest number of particles. Lab technicians may be encouraged to spend hours to look around to find the most photogenic image, the one that most looks like pure virus.

There is no way to tell that the RNA being used in the new coronavirus PCR test is found in those particles seen in the electron micrograph. There is no connection between the test, and the particles, and no proof that the particles are viral.

A similar situation was revealed in March 1997 concerning HIV, when two papers published in the same issue of the journal “Virology” revealed that the vast majority of what had previously been called “pure HIV” was impurities that were clearly not HIV, and the mixture also included microvesicles that look very similar to HIV under an electron microscope, but are of cellular origin.”

People, stop drinking the Kool-Aid and start listening to the science and the backstory I’ve painted above -  it’s the same crap, different day, same agenda.

Corona - move along, nothing to see here - if we all push back and don’t buy tickets for the show - there is no show.

Until the next time.

Hopefully by then we will have learned or at least remembered HIV and corona and all the other invented pathogens that are promoted as the biological threat that will wipe us all out.

Viruses, even if real, don’t have an agenda - they have a biological imperative to gestate, replicate and succeed - our “leaders” on the other hand, seem to be hellbent on imposing a not-so-subtle campaign of eugenics on the global population, royalty and US one-percenters having openly admitted this.

They are the real threat to the common man.