False-positive “case” pandemic not a viral Holocaust

 

Rampant “case”- load hysteria 

A widely published contemporary author (whom I follow[ed]) on Facebook has recently been proselytising about the Covid vaccine being “the only way out of this mess.” 

When I privately and politely enquired into his justification for such a statement given the raft of contradictory statistics and scientific data available from verifiable sources, I was roundly chastised for being some type of dangerous lunatic and given the proverbial bum’s rush without a shred of discussion around the actual points raised. 

There’s a virus, there’s a vaccine that fixes everything - anything else is conspiracy nonsense - end of discussion. 

However...

On November 22, 2020 a landmark court case in Portugal ruled that the polymerase chain reaction test (PCR) used worldwide to diagnose COVID-19 was not fit for purpose.  Most importantly, the judges ruled that a single positive PCR test cannot be used as an effective diagnosis of infection.

“In their ruling, judges Margarida Ramos de Almeida and Ana Paramés referred to severalscientific studies. Most notably   

Correlation Between 3790 Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction–Positives Samples and Positive Cell Cultures, Including 1941 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Isolates

found that – when running PCR tests with 35 cycles or more – the accuracy dropped to 3%, meaning up to 97% of positive results could be false positives.

The ruling goes on to conclude that, based on the science they read, any PCR test using over 25 cycles is totally unreliable. Governments and private labs have been very tight-lipped about the exact number of cycles they run when PCR testing, but it is known to sometimes be as high as 45. Even Anthony Fauci has publicly stated anything over 35 is totally unusable.”

This test is the means whereby the infection rate and claimed cases are being recorded globally and it is scientifically unarguably spurious. 

The science says so. 

And yet people who aren’t sick and cannot be reliably claimed as being asymptomatic, are being labelled as COVID cases as a result and this misrepresentation of the reality is the basis whereby lockdowns, masks and other restrictions are being imposed.  

All based on a fatally flawed premise. 

Here’s a little video link to the inventor of the PCR process, Kary Mullis outlining what it was actually designed to do. https://www.dropbox.com/s/sb0ahl555h2gc3d/Kary%20Mullis%20and%20corona%20.mp4.mp4?dl=0

The Portuguese Courts agree with this - why shouldn’t they - he invented the process hence the ruling as it being unfit for purpose. 

There’s a raft of peer reviewed studies which reach the same conclusions and even the WHO back in December warned clinicians about high rates of false positives and yet here we are. https://www.dropbox.com/s/o4zbzgd5rp55m27/WHO%20Information%20Notice%20for%20IVD%20Users.pdf?dl=0

When science goes wrong - in the hands of politicians and an ignorant media. 

So maybe another “way out of this mess” is to read the science properly and use accurate testing that is fit for purpose in order to build meaningful infection and mortality databases with which to inform the public.  

Similarly if the baseline premise is flawed and overstated, which it unarguably is, then the assignments of deaths FROM COVID rather than WITH COVID takes on an entirely different picture. The US Centers for Disease Control And Prevention (CDC) similarly admitted as far back as July 2020 (the “peak” of the pandemic there) 94% of deaths that occurred in the US WITH COVID had at least 2 or more contributing factors at play thus potentially the actual death rate purely FROM COVID was as little as 6% of the stated totals. This takes those total claimed (with) COVID death counts from 255,500 (at that time) to around 15,330, a significant bit of statistical information that changes the landscape and the true impact of the pandemic dramatically. But this wasn’t readily shared. 

It’s not a bit of woo-woo conspiracy theorising - it’s all right there on the website. 

https://www.dropbox.com/s/u5aiftnws11okyb/CDC_covid19-comorbidity-expanded-12092020-508.pdf?dl=0

Nobody should be arguing about protecting vulnerable people (particularly the elderly) from disease and seasonal influenza which kills around 650,000+ people annually globally but we should certainly be interrogating the mainstream media which isn’t covering the full aspects of this situation and haven’t been from the get go. 

Sweden and Japan didn’t impose lockdown restrictions (measures which have unavoidable inbuilt attrition by default) and those countries have had equal or better results than the countries who have gone the whole hog such as the UK. 

So when one does actually analyse these factors and the globally published stats (even with an overstated infection and mortality rate) that people between the ages of 0-69 have a better than 99.8% recovery rate from this condition, it does beg the question why one would be rushing to receive a vaccine with an arguably claimed efficacy of 95% at best? 

And like as always - just logic, no anti vax sentiment - if the vaccine works then there should be no risk posed by those who haven’t had one, and this should be everyone’s sovereign choice, given that innate immunity is statistically and verifiably more effective in the first place. 

In counterpoint, the vaccine makers state on their inserts that the vaccine does not prevent transmission of the virus once vaccinated and similarly it does not prevent vaccine recipients from contracting the virus. It’s purportedly designed instead to reduce severity if infected and even the WHO has stipulated that despite vaccination  there will be a reliance on the population attaining herd immunity to overcome the situation. That is something that occurs naturally within populations and has done since time immemorial as the human immune system adapts to each new mutation of infection. 

Thus, innate immunity is an obvious and supportable option and everyone should respect that instead of this ridiculous polarising debate that goes on all day long about stupid anti and pro vaxxers. 

I agree we should read the science and maybe stop watching quite so much sponsored mainstream news. 

The science is as outlined above.  

Vax away or don’t as you see fit. 

But vaccinating certainly isn’t the only way out of this mess... and removing people’s right to that choice or not is most decidedly not the way forward either - that merely creates a problem potentially more virulent and damaging than any coronavirus.