LEFTIST LIBERAL IRONY

 

This pile of dog turd appeared recently. 

Clearly, I couldn’t agree...with almost all of it. I do, however, have no issues with Mexicans and they make nice culinary origami that can be stuffed with incredible fillings....

Point for point though: 

1. Antifa may indeed be an acronym for anti-fascism but the crop of disparate groups who rallied during 2020 were unarguably mustered very deliberately into an organised movement carrying banners and flags (often masked for anonymity) gathering to purportedly quell the racism and fascist leanings of the so-called “Trump supporters” all now apparently xenophobic, fascist, racist hooligans, which is simply facile and entirely disingenuous. Ergo anyone who voted for or supported Trump was a brainless racist idiot. I don’t think so. What’s more, (even cursory research confirms this) the collated Antifa gatherings anywhere Trump supporters rallied, more often than not erupted into violence initiated by the Antifa faction of those rallies, not the Trump cohort of the group.  And the Antifa brigade are quite comfortable using violence to spread their message of “liberty and democracy” apparently.  Sure, everyone should be pro-choice which is what true democracy means - the right to choose a leader,  a neighbourhood, a movie, a car, whatever and fascism removes the right to choice. Just remember this when it comes to vaccines and body autonomy. 

2. The “Democrat” (insert derisive laughter here) Joe Biden has done more to “socialise” the US economy in his first few months of office than Trump did in four years. Moving along... this is like saying Democrats in the US are actually liberal politically. They should be, by definition, but as with the Liberal party in Australia, nothing could be less liberal if you tried. They are conservative and socialist to the core, hiding behind the veil of a so called free economy which has done nothing but enrich the 1 percenters and ensure that the little guy, the ordinary American is squeezed dry. I’d happily bet that those ordinary Americans felt better under Trump than what passes for so called liberal democracy currently. 

3. Regarding presidential election fraud, the US so-called justice system notwithstanding - not one single body or legal or electoral expert has answered the question: how do 1.8 million mailed out ballots become 2.5 million mail in ballots in the final count? One can debate the inconsistencies and vagaries of the state legislatures, which did indeed fail to process the proposed lawsuits, not, however through a lack of evidence (there was and remains a plethora of unanswered evidence) but they simply failed to do their jobs. Had they done so and followed the judicial process rather than stonewalling each application, there would likely have been a very different outcome. Regardless, please point me to the cogent legal argument that resolves the mail in ballot mathematical anomaly. 

4. If, as you argue, “no one truly knows when life begins” in utero, how can you logically presume to know when it ends within the womb? Surely by this logic, one shouldn’t take a chance if one doesn’t truly know? What is, however factual and not just a vague opinion  is that the rate of survival for babies born at the generally “accepted” legal abortion threshold of 24-26 weeks (depends on the State) is between 60-77%. So, in effect, people who are aborting within these parameters (and there are plenty of them) aren’t simply erasing an unwanted mistake that wouldn’t have made it anyway,  they are destroying a human that has a better chance of healthily surviving than it would have of dying even at that premature juncture.  You do the math. Statistically, regardless of anyone’s supposed right to choose, aborting viable humans is killing babies that had very high chances of surviving had they been born. So anyone supporting that is by unarguable statistical reality, supporting the killing of babies. The moral,  ethical and spiritual arguments are something again entirely but there’s no escaping the scientific factuality that obtains. 

5. All Trump supporters are NOT QAnon supporters thus to suggest they are, is patently ludicrous and speaks to a profound presumptuousness and lack of knowledge.  I for one, am neither a Trump “supporter” nor an adept of QAnon but we’ve all been exposed to both phenomena.  White hats, black hats, all that stuff - never had much time for it. Better to follow what’s actually happening and MOST Trump supporters did just that. 

6. Climate change is real. Yes, indeed, climate, as cyclical as it undeniably is, changes all the time - ergo: climate “change” is real. That’s all climate does really - change. Catastrophic anthropogenic climate change is, however, scientifically unverifiable. There are hypotheses on both sides of that divide but whether NASA is flying bots and drones or arguably faking or making moon landings, carbon dioxide is not what it is being made out to be and being a gas four times less dense than atmospheric air - is NOT sitting at the upper atmosphere heating up the planet. Pure material physics disavows that possibility. It is doing what it’s done for millions of years, being discharged by a myriad of life forms on the planet while being “inhaled” as it descends toward the ground by plants who require it for heathy existence.  The notion of carbon credits and taxes based on CO2 emissions or the like is pure pseudoscientific fiction. But it does suit an elitist capitalistic agenda more than the purported saving of the planet. So in that sense, Trump is on the money regarding the climate and the industrialised “human influence” on it. When ice core samples prove that CO2 was at far greater density when the planet was provably much cooler than it is currently, this serves to torpedo the argument that any more CO2 in the air is going to warm the planet up fatally. It’s bollocks. Pollution from industry on the other hand - different thing entirely and Trump, should’ve  cleaned up the industrialists more than he did. But this spurious nonsense (propagated by establishment stooges like Greta Thunberg) about seven years to live before the Earth is uninhabitable due to the increase in ambient temperature is just that - utter nonsense.  There’s a very good reason that a raft of accredited scientists walked away from the IPCC - the whole matter of “climate change” had become politicised and the data was being fudged to maintain the catastrophist stance - disingenuously so. Heaps of source material for this if you are willing to look. But, of course, anyone (regardless of their scientific credibility) who dares question this narrative, is immediately labelled a lunatic conspiracy theorist. Yep, they go from revered expert (when touting the establishment script) to fringe idiot in an instant as soon as anything is questioned. And that’s what science seeks or should seek to do - question everything all the time. The science is never “settled” and anyone who uses this tired, lazy throwaway line as some form of bogus authoritative statement, should be treated with the utmost caution, skepticism and perhaps a modicum of reciprocal contempt. But hey, let’s go back to Al Gore’s hockey stick graph - that was the truth too apparently....

7.  Ah yes, COVID killed over half a million Americans - that old chestnut. I’m assuming you’ve scoured the CDC statistics and mortality graphs for 2019 and 2020 when, of course, it was claimed they were at the peak of the pandemic? No? Well, I have. And the figures aren’t what appear in the media. Funny that.  At that point, the media, in its frenzy of Trump-bashing declared that he had allowed 400,000 Americans to die from COVID on his watch. Let me repeat that - die FROM COVID... Not WITH COVID but FROM COVID. So without resorting to conspiracy websites and fringe loonies and even the mainstream media, who were making these unverifiable and outlandish claims, let’s look at the facts instead. Something I’ve always attempted to do. Not what’s in the print or visual or social media but the statistical data itself. That’s where the answers are. First up, just deflecting to your mate, Neil Ferguson’s catastrophically wrong catastrophist predictions (again - he’s been hopelessly wrong in the past too yet still maintains a professional position, Fauci too but more on him later) when he first modelled the impending COVID deaths.... all wrong. Fantastically incorrect. But what was even more misleading was the means whereby they elected to concoct the infection database in the first place - PCR “testing”. Happy to provide a plethora of links back to papers and interviews and statements from Kary Mullis, the inventor of this process - not a test, an analytical tool. This wonderful invention, whether by design or default was used inappropriately to “test” people FOR the presence of SARS-Cov-2 when it could do no such thing, no matter how colourful the language used to assert that it was a reliable diagnostical tool. Hell, the CDC and the WHO published pages in December 2020 on their websites alerting clinicians to the fact that depending on the number of replication cycles and base material, the “test” could be up to 97% inaccurate. In other words, depending on sample artefacts and replication cycles (an entirely arbitrary range decided by lab or by country and not necessarily standardised anywhere) the false-positive PCR+ counts could be overstated by as much as 97% - all downplayed and obfuscated by the media instead of them being outraged and doing their job which would have banner headlines claiming FRAUD. Nah, not in this case. So, as has happened consistently through this so called pandemic, people who were noticeably not sick or presenting with any symptoms were urged to be tested using this spurious “test” because suddenly, healthy people were labeled as being potentially asymptomatic. This has latterly been proven to be false. A vast Chinese and Australian study refutes this outright. Never in the history of virology or epidemiology have healthy people required to be tested for anything especially when no symptoms are present. Even so, when their natural immune responses lit up the “test” with false positives despite the 97% inaccuracy warning, this data was used to build the pandemic infection rate. Happy to send on all of the links to this scientific material if you wish. Then early in the piece, the WHO stipulated that even when people presented with any flulike symptoms, “to be safe”, clinicians around the world should consider these as COVID cases - this ahead of even the dodgy PCR test. So from the get-go, there were all of these flulike cases reassigned to COVID cases and then a ramping up when PCR hit the scene and millions of people tested positive for..... whatever the PCR happened to be amplifying at the time. Not virus but sample artefacts even in normal healthy people.  Then there’s the knock-on assumption that if any of those people who have tested positive on this nonsensical test happen to die from anything whatsoever, then they are deemed to have died not WITH COVID but as a result of COVID. Do you have any idea how insanely unrealistic, illogical and unscientific that is, not to mention, unprecedented...? All of a sudden all of the rules had been rewritten. But even if you do accept all of these bogus factors, the majority of deaths, in almost all countries, were among the elderly and over 95% of the mortality was in those with preexisting health conditions. How extremely unusual - NOT. But in those cases, nobody was permitted to admit that the stage 4 cancer or heart disease had killed the patient - if he or she had “tested” positive for COVID - that was to be put on the death certificate as the cause of death. You don’t see anything wrong with any of this yet? Then there are the death counts themselves. We have to take over 90% of the deaths that have been attributed to COVID as being falsely assigned given the anomalous nature of the diagnosis in the first place. This could have been flu, pneumonia or any of a raft of the common conditions that kill millions of elderly people every year, notwithstanding their preexisting health issues, statistically noted by even the CDC (again in December of 2020) comorbidity (preexisting health issues) as being the likely cause of “COVID-related” deaths - in other words they were stating that the death rate directly attributable to COVID could be as little as 6% of the stated total death count. At that time around 200,000, which could have readily been reduced to 12,000 at the stroke of a WHO / CDC pen. That should be seriously problematical for anyone but as usual, the mainstream media, who are let’s face it, sock puppets of the pharmaceutical industry, weren’t reporting any of this. So the only real way of actually proving that there was something killing people at a higher rate than normal between 2019 and 2020 pre and during-COVID was to analyse the TOTAL deaths from all causes between those 2 years, which is what I and a few other people did.  And the results of those analyses quite unambiguously revealed that the then claimed excess deaths from COVID for the whole year, of 400,000 was entirely false. Factoring in population growth and total counts proportionally across those 2 years the total death count did not exceed 252,000 in any of the CDC datasets and there is certainly not a 400,000 total  and nowhere near a 600,000 total. So one has to question where these figures are coming from and why? Depending how one arrives at the CDC total death counts (the data is messy but the totals aren’t anywhere what the media is stating) these vary but even in the worst case scenario and factoring in the population increase of 0.9% between the 2 years, the difference in total death counts shows an increase of 0.105% from 0.84% ratio of death to total population to 0.94% in 2020 at a maximum of 252,074 whereas other figures state even lower rates than this. Nowhere does it figure anywhere near the claimed 400,000 or 600,000 - these figures bandied about by the media are entirely fictitious. Yet nobody is questioning this. Why is nobody asking why the media is lying to us about the death count? Isn’t that more of a serious issue than bashing Trump supporters? Your media is distorting facts and reality to foment fear within people and have you arrive at false conclusions then use this false narrative to accuse anyone who doesn’t buy the obvious bullshit as being irresponsible or dangerous and having blood on their hands for NOT buying it. I’d argue that the misinformed who refuse to analyse the available datasets are the ones who pose more of a threat to normal society by running around crying wolf and victimising fellow citizens for no good reason. Based on the real figures, the pandemic was indeed a hoax as it doesn’t qualify in any manner or form as some virulent disease that ravaged the population. There is very strong data available that medical abdication of care resulting from fear and mistreatment through the lockdowns and incorrect applications of ventilators etc, could be largely attributable to an increase in deaths (not to mention stress, increased depression and suicides due to the draconian and unjustifiable lockdowns of people and commerce everywhere)  but everything that happened in 2020 was reassigned to COVID by default. It’s utter bullshit. Iatrogenic death runs at over 30% per annum in the US - ponder that for a moment - over 30% of recorded deaths are directly attributable to the medical system itself, misdiagnosis, malpractice, surgical error, prescription drug related etc.  and in a year of medical panic do you think that figure went down? Come on. As for masks, just as an example, here in Australia in April 2003 when the coronavirus known as SARS swept the country, the University of Sydney was consulted on the matter of masks as a mitigating measure, whereupon they asserted unequivocally that masks were useless as prophylaxes for such viruses - they neither stopped viral particles nor did they confer any benefit to the wearers. The Sydney Morning Herald ran an article at the time stressing this and the government stance was that anyone trying to disingenuously sell masks to the Australian public under false pretences (i.e. claiming they were effective) were liable for fines up to $110,000 as this was overtly exploitative.  Now suddenly masks have been recredited with a new and demonstrably false efficacy. Even Tony Fauci has asserted this openly, as have the WHO but there’s this hysterical ethos that anyone failing to wear a mask, even the healthy normal people, they somehow pose a threat to others. Maybe such people need a commonsense transplant as this seems to have flown out of the window during these times. The statistics on the so called pandemic have consistently confirmed that the recovery rate across the population is better than 99.89% on average and that infection rates (bearing in mind, these are based on the fatally flawed PCR in the first place) are no worse than seasonal flu - better when you bin the PCR false positives and run that down by 95% or so. People have died, yes, and they continue to die as they do every year. Statistically in no greater numbers than before. Not even in India.  But let’s not let a little factuality get in the way of abject panic. Given that the global population  attained a herd immunity status months ago and innate immunity is measurably more effective than any of the experimental “vaccines” they’ve concocted for this cold virus (that’s what it is), there is no sane, logical, medical or scientific reason that anyone, particularly healthy people would require to be vaccinated and certainly no requirement to lock down/quarantine healthy people under these circumstances.  The whole thing is absurd in the extreme. Vulnerable people (mostly the aged or immunocompromised) should obviously be protected, as they are every year, but none of this insane restrictive crap has ever been necessary and Sweden amply proved that when one analyses the stats. So, no, dissident people who refused to wear masks or shunned the restrictions, have not contributed in any way to the annual death statistics across the planet anywhere and they certainly don’t have “blood on their hands” and haven’t extended anything - there was no pandemic to extend, merely a trumped up hysteria around PCR+ cases which are utterly meaningless. Fact.  Truth be told, the media is guilty of misreporting all of this and the false data that has been touted as fact, is the principle reason these unnecessary lockdown measures have been perpetuated.  It’s a crime against humanity period. 

8. Rapists and murderers exist among all people, foreign nationals among them but Trump’s heavy handed stance on immigration and in particular the Mexican border situation, verged on the hysterical  - no arguments there. 

9.  Right wing biased media is undeniably insidious, almost as insidious as the bullshit that passes for mainstream leftist liberal media, which, as amply demonstrated time and again has no interest in actually undertaking any form of objective journalism. The farce that was the US presidential election and the ongoing bilge that emanates from the main outlets around COVID attest to that. 

10. Jesus, if he existed, would have probably had a hard time reconciling himself with the fact that a cultist religion was built up in reverence to him by a converted Roman when he, himself was a hardcore militant Jew. Followers of Jesus would, by default then have been Jewish by faith as he was.  The humble man who was all about the message and not the messenger would likely have had little truck with the Christian faith that politically and bloodily evolved from his Essene teachings and the millions that have suffered and perished supposedly in his and his father’s name. I’d also wager that he’d most likely forgive Trump his sins as he would any other mortal soul. But hey out of all of these bullet point comments, this is the only one based in opinion. The others speak to verifiable facts.  So while Trump supporters might be appreciative of the opinions proffered, they aren’t necessarily things that they “should know” as almost all of them are fatally inaccurate and poorly researched.

What continues to slay me is this mirrored hypocrisy of the left when they hurl these accusations at anyone who might question the source of their viewpoint which seems to be mainstream “news.”  

And the reductionist simplification of: anyone who questions the media “authority” is anti-leftist liberal Democrat / ergo: they are right wing / ergo: they must be Trump supporters / ergo: they are xenophobic, racist,  violent, fascist extremists / ergo: they are mainstream denialists who are probably anti-vaxxers too / ergo: they are dangerous and must be stopped and they are everything that is wrong with America. 

Meanwhile, the current political and mainstream federal ethos that obtains is one of removing the right to choice insofar as body autonomy and health and free movement and the right to assemble is concerned. Ergo: the current system that these critics support is demonstrably and unarguably fascist. 

The irony is staggering.