Whenever this topic is raised, the supporters of vaccination become almost rabid in their defence of the drugs as if to not vaccinate and have a choice about that is somehow the most dangerous, irresponsible thing imaginable.
It truly isn’t.
What is asserted by
the media, the medical establishment and particularly the pharmaceutical
industry itself is the following:
1. Vaccines are safe - they have been rigorously tested
2. Vaccines do not cause autism
3. Vaccination, when up around 95%+ uptake confers “herd immunity”
4. Unvaccinated kids pose a threat to vaccinated kids
5. To not vaccinate your children is akin to giving them a death
sentence
6. Vaccines eradicated polio and smallpox
7. The establishment (and the pharmaceutical industry) would not
lie about vaccines - that would be unethical
8. Mercury has been removed from all vaccines
9. The anti-vaccination movement is a recent and dangerous fad
peopled by uninformed, hysterical pseudoscientists and hippies who get their bogus
information from the internet and social media
1. Vaccines are
safe.
Very hard to make
this claim empirically when no vaccine has ever been subjected to a double
blind inert placebo safety trial. They simply have not been tested in this way.
As modern vaccines were originally developed in a fast-track mode to “combat”
the threat of biological warfare, they were conveniently reclassified from the
status of drugs to “biologics” thereby bypassing the need for long-term
(years-long) safety trials as is mandatory with all other drugs. Vaccines can
go from lab to pharmacy in as little as weeks with no double-blind inert
placebo testing whatsoever. The establishment will tell you that it is
unethical to withhold “life-saving” drugs from the public and children in
particular or to run trials where measles is tested, however, they have no
problem issuing drugs to market that have not been safety tested on any study
group whatsoever with no way of knowing or predicting the potential harm.
Studies are regularly yet meaninglessly done using a previous version of a
vaccine as a baseline for the new vaccine - that is not recognised science -
that is junk science and would be rejected in peer review for any drug other
than vaccines. Many pro-vaccine articles and blogs etc. do, however, attempt to
debunk the statement that vaccines do not undergo double-blind inert placebo
safety trials and cite links to so-called double blind inert placebo studies, but when investigated, 99% of
them are, in fact controlled vaccine v vaccine studies, which proves nothing
without an inceptual baseline on the first vaccine, which has never been done.
That’s the point.
Therefore there is
no scientifically documented risk profile for a single commercial vaccine
The DTP vaccine (in
clinical trials - vaccinated v unvaccinated) returned a 10 times greater risk
of death in infants who were vaccinated (from other causes) than the
unvaccinated cohort.
According to the
CDC website, children who were born prior to 1989 (when the vaccine schedule
was dramatically ramped up) have only a 12% chance of contracting a chronic
illness (as listed on the vaccine inserts and their website) whereas, children
born after 1989 who were subjected to the new increased schedule, have a 54%
chance of contracting one of these chronic illnesses. (But nothing to do with
the vaccines, even though these illnesses are all listed as adverse reactions
to the vaccines.)
Since the advent of
the vaccine injury compensation fund in 1986 (and even though vaccine makers
are exempt from prosecution regardless of the lack of safety or how serious the
damage the vaccine may cause - even death) over $4billion has been paid out to
victims of vaccine injury, many of these listed as ASD injuries. Startlingly,
however, since doctors and hospitals derive huge financial benefits from Big
Pharma, less than 5% of true vaccine injuries are actually formally recorded as
such. If they were, the cases and payouts would be off the charts - ergo, the
stats and the factual reality is grossly downplayed.
Vaccines can and do
cause serious chronic adverse side-effects including ASD (autism) and other
permanent neurological disabilities and death as well as a host of autoimmune
diseases, cancer, development disorders, allergies, asthma - the list is
extensive. The place that you will see the statistics of current chronic
ailments afflicting US children is on the CDC website. The other place you will
find this exact same list is in the vaccine inserts. Coincidence? Extremely
unlikely.
The reported
incidence of cervical cancer in young women and girls through the administering
of the HPV vaccine, is shockingly high yet is downplayed in the media for
obvious reasons. This vaccine is regularly and tragically destroying young
women’s lives quite unnecessarily. [3]
The flu vaccine is
ineffective and while the package inserts state that the vaccine will not give
you flu, the side effects are listed as: headaches, nausea, coughing, runny
nose, joint pains - in fact, all the symptoms of flu - fancy that. But it’s not
flu - just feels like it. Oh, and many of the flu vaccines still have mercury
in them.
2. Vaccines do not
cause autism
Vaccines can and do
cause a range of ASD’s and the vaccine makers assert as much in their package
inserts so the populist platitude by the establishment that vaccines definitely
do not cause autism is as bogus as the safety claims. The makers of the drugs even
admit this. Doctors and/or the media and/or the government and/or the
regulators either don’t know what they’re talking about, which is of extreme
concern or they do and they are blatantly lying to the public, which is an even
bigger concern.
The Vaccine Court
has paid out numerous vaccine injury cases where autism was listed as the
injury sustained. Ergo, the legal system has also ruled that vaccines can and
do cause autism.
3. Vaccination,
when up around 95%+ uptake confers “herd immunity”
This is patently
and provably false. Many studies and reported events have demonstrated that
vaccinated cohorts of the population where the uptake is as high as 98% does
not automatically confer a so-called herd-immunity to the rest of the cohort.
In fact, it is very often the case that the vaccinated members of the group
contract the illnesses against which they have been vaccinated. This is
particularly prevalent with measles and mumps but seldom, if ever, reported in
the mainstream media.
Even entirely
vaccinated cohorts (such was the case recently on a US naval vessel - the USS
Fort McHenry) contract the diseases against which they have been vaccinated -
in the case in point - mumps, where the ship could not put into harbour for
several weeks until the epidemic had passed. [1]
What is, however,
unarguable, is the fact that non-vaccinated kids who contract measles and/or
other diseases naturally, will, once the illness has been dealt with by the
body’s immune system, enjoy lifelong immunity from the contracted disease.
Conversely, once a chemical vaccine has been administered, the body is reliant
on frequent booster shots throughout one’s lifetime to maintain so-called
immunity from the disease.
4. Unvaccinated
kids pose a threat to vaccinated kids
If vaccines are
effective in protecting those who receive them, there should be no logical
reason whatsoever why an unvaccinated person should pose any form of threat to
the vaccinated.
If however, as
statistics have shown, the vaccinated still contract the diseases against which
they have been vaccinated, then the infected vaccinated members of the group
pose as much if not more of a threat to the group as the unvaccinated arguably
might do.
Having said that,
multiple studies measuring general health and wellbeing between vaccinated and
unvaccinated cohorts of the community, repeatedly show that the unvaccinated
are by far healthier than the unvaccinated and far less likely to fall prey to
the previously mentioned chronic lifetime ailments that beset the vaccinated
cohort of the community. Yet the governments refuse to conduct a mass
vaccinated v unvaccinated study despite the fact that they have the database at
their disposal with government mandated medical records. The results of this
study would kill this debate once and for all. [2]
5. To not vaccinate
your children is akin to giving them a death sentence
This is patently
false as the general approach to vaccination has been to “prevent” innocuous
childhood ailments such as measles, mumps, chickenpox, and the like, all of
which, although highly infectious, are minor illnesses for which natural
immunity is adequately equipped to address, besides which, as noted, natural
contraction of these illnesses will (in most cases) confer lifetime immunity.
It is a statistical
reality that sanitation and improved hygiene and living standards throughout
the world, reduced (and virtually eradicated) most of these illnesses decades,
if not centuries ago prior to the introduction of vaccines.
It is not necessary
to vaccinate a newborn baby against hepatitis unless the mother is a carrier of
the virus and then again, there is every likelihood that the child’s natural
immune system will cope with the virus accordingly as has occurred since time
immemorial.
6. Vaccines
eradicated polio and smallpox
This has been
assumed as empirical fact through forced repetition of the assertion, however,
once again it is mere populist perception rather than fact and is patently and
demonstrably false.
Aside from a raft
of issues with the polio vaccine including contamination with simian virus and
cancer-causing cells, the disease has never been eradicated, although its
prevalence was on dramatic decline before the introduction of the vaccine.
Currently in the western and the developing world, variant strains of
(polio)myelitis are not uncommon, thus the disease still exists but has simply
been renamed in the interests of perpetuating a false perception as to the
efficacy of the original vaccine. [4]
The original case
for vaccination - a cure for smallpox as promoted by the father of vaccines,
Edward Jenner, occurred with no understanding of bacterial and viral infection,
thus no vaccine science actually existed. It was all pure trial and error
experimentation - but you have to start somewhere, right? The idea was to
culture cowpox virus (it was rumoured that milkmaids who had been exposed to
cowpox seemed less susceptible to smallpox) and inject small amounts of it into
humans to assist them in building antibodies (which were unknown at that stage)
to smallpox. In order to test the theory, on May 14, 1796, he removed some
fluid from a dairy maid named Sarah (Nelmes) and then injected it into the arm
of James Phipps, a healthy 8-year old boy. … Phipps contracted cowpox, and six
weeks later Jenner injected him with smallpox, in which he took the fluid from
an actual pock. When James did not come down with smallpox, Jenner concluded
that cowpox protects the human constitution from the infection of smallpox. This
indeed is the basis upon which the entire field of vaccination rests. What is
seldom mentioned in the popular retelling of this story is that Jenner
re-vaccinated James Phipps 20 times, and that Phipps died of tuberculosis when
he was 20 years old. Jenner also vaccinated his 11-month-old son Edward at
least twice. Young Edward Jenner was reported to have had a bad reaction to the
smallpox vaccination his father gave him and shown signs of “mild mental
retardation.” He also succumbed to tuberculosis when he was 21 years old. It is
interesting to note that tuberculosis has been linked to the smallpox vaccine.
Alexander Wilder, MD, professor of pathology and former editor of The New York
Medical Times said in the 19th century: “Vaccination is the infusion of a
contaminating element into the system, and after such contamination you can
never be sure of regaining the former purity of the body. Consumption
(tuberculosis) follows in the wake of vaccination as certainly as effect
follows cause.”
Moreover, smallpox
attained its maximum mortality after vaccination was introduced. The mean
annual mortality to 10,000 population from 1850 to 1869 was at the rate of
2.04, whereas in 1871 the death rate was 10.24 and in 1872 the death rate was
8.33, and this after the most laudable efforts to extend vaccination by
legislative enactments. The fairytale legend of a country doctor making a
discovery that saved the world from the devastation of smallpox is a
fundamental medical belief that continues to be echoed by indoctrinated and naïve
doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of
medical professionals remains a pillar of their vaccine faith. But the true
history shows us a different reality. [5]
7. The
establishment (and the pharmaceutical industry) would not lie about vaccines -
that would be unethical
They can and they
do lie and it is indeed unethical, however, the majority of clinicians maintain
a firm “belief” in vaccines despite a plethora of science and mounting physical
evidence in the field that vaccines can and do cause incalculable harm to tens
of thousands of people, impacting many of them for life and even causing death.
As has been demonstrated, repetition of a false statement by authorities and
media such as “vaccines are safe” merely makes the statement widely heard, not
factual.
The establishment
also goes to extreme lengths to shut down any debate on this issue through
(all) media and refuses to engage scientists and medical experts in public
debates on vaccination. One has to ask oneself - if the “science is settled” as
is claimed, why would there be any need to refuse a public debate when this
should surely shut up the vaccine skeptics once and for all? Could it be that
the science is not settled and the establishment is afraid of the revelations
that would become public knowledge?
Given that vaccines
(especially in the cases of the minor childhood ailments so frequently at the
centre of this issue: measles, mumps, rubella, chickenpox etc.) are
demonstrably unnecessary for children when innate natural immunity is more than
able to cope with these ailments, it would seem strange that such militant
vehemence to “force” these drugs on the public is evident. This is exemplified
by no-jab-no-school and no-jab-no-benefits policies in various countries where
social/educational or financial punishment is threatened if parents refuse to
vaccinate their children. This can only be described as medical tyranny -
fascism - where the right to freedom of informed choice is removed from
ordinary citizens, this on the pretext of being in the interest of public
health, which is spurious in the extreme. It is in the interest of obscene
profit and repeat business when vaccine-damaged victims are required to buy
medication for life as a result of the chronic ailments suffered as the
side-effects of vaccination.
What is even more
staggering, is the fact that while vaccine injury can be (and very often is)
proven through the onerous legal process, in the US, the manufacturers of the
vaccines cannot be directly sued (they are legally exempt from liability) and
no matter how serious the injury or how unsafe the product, they bear no
responsibility. Not even when it comes to compensation. That is derived from a
taxpayer funded budget - in other words, one gets to compensate oneself for the
benefit of having been damaged by a drug company and that company gets off Scot
free and has no incentive or compulsion to change the product that is causing
the harm. This model would sit comfortably in the domain of organised crime
(for that’s what this is) rather than in the public health sector where the
Hippocratic Oath’s first tenet of Doing No Harm has fallen completely by the
wayside.
The industry lies
about these drugs to such a degree, employing pro-vaccine trolls and shills to
promote the deception and shut down social media debates on the issue as well
as shame any parent claiming a vaccine-injured child when under any circumstance
other than vaccines, the doctor will take the word of the parent as the prime
reference to infant health. One has to ask why this is? Is it perhaps that the
vaccine business in the US alone grosses over $50 billion per annum and this is
nothing compared with the treatment of the epidemic of chronic illnesses rife
among the current American children (unknown prior to 1989 when the schedule
was ramped up) which exceeds $500 billion per annum - mostly an annuity income
for the industry for every victim’s life. The amounts are absolutely
staggering. And if that is not worth lying and cheating for, I guess nothing is
- even though they’re supposed to be doing this for public health not private
profit.
8. Mercury has been
removed from all vaccines
After years of
debate around (unbelievably) the toxicity of mercury (as if this is somehow
surprising), the pharmaceutical industry, for the most part, removed Thimerosal
(the mercury-based preservative) from most of the childhood vaccines. But not
from all of the flu shots. One has to ask why? Mercury is one of the most
powerful neurotoxins known to man and yet for decades it was used in vaccines
in quantities far in excess of any EPA listed safety levels. And these were
being injected into day-old babies willy-nilly. [8]
Although they
continued to claim that ethyl-mercury was “harmless’ manufacturers began
voluntarily removing Thimerosal from pediatric vaccines around 2000. It is
assumed that most pediatric vaccines containing Thimerosal were “off the
shelves” by 2003. (No vaccines were recalled.) Even so, most infants are still
routinely given Thimerosal-containing influenza vaccine even though there are
Thimerosal-free and vaccines with trace amounts of Thimerosal. Infants
receiving a Thimerosal-containing influenza vaccine are dosed at 6 months with
12.5 mcg of ethyl mercury and at 7 months with an additional 12.5 mcg. Adult
Thimerosal-containing vaccines contain roughly 25mcg. All of these
Thimerosal-containing version exceed federal safety guidelines [7]
It was deemed
unsafe for pregnant mothers to eat mercury-rich tuna fish where the mercury
content was far below that of the childhood vaccines, yet it was okay for the
latter to be injected into newborn babies. In defence of this, Paul Offit (US
Professor of vaccinology, owner of multiple vaccine patents and vocal defender
of vaccinology) was heard to say that Thimerosal was the “safe” mercury and
this type of mercury left the body safely within a week of vaccination. While
it is true it say that no traces of mercury were found in the excreta, urine,
blood, sweat, hair or nails of the recently vaccinated babies tested, further
independent tests on lab animals (similarly injected) found the mercury had not
left the body at all - it had merely gone to the brain where, when synthesising
to organic mercury compound, it caused devastating and irreversible harm and
mental retardation. This was what was also happening to the babies. Yet Offit
was firm in his “belief” in the good old vaccines, even going as far as to say
that babies’ immune systems could easily withstand 10,000 vaccine shots at any
one time. He actually said this. And he’s The vaccine boss so no arguing with
Paul. [6]
9. The
anti-vaccination movement is a recent and dangerous fad peopled by uninformed,
hysterical pseudoscientists and hippies who get their bogus information from
the internet and social media
False on every
count. The anti-vaccination movement has been live and well since the time of
Edward Jenner when he first launched his questionable “preventative modality”
on the public.
The science, while
being far from “settled” as the mainstream would have one believe, is solidly
tilted in favour of those who question vaccine safety. It is also more accurate
to say that many people active in this safer vaccine campaign were, more often
than is credited, once pro-vaccine and had their children on the current
vaccine schedule and as the result of their own negative experiences with
vaccines or further research, have opted to question the safety associated with
vaccines as the information that is provided through the mainstream is,
unarguably inaccurate at best and downright misleading in many cases. So not
everyone can nor should they be tagged with this hysterical pejorative anti-vax
title when, in fact they are simply pro-safe-vaccines.
Contrary to
media-fuelled populist perception, many (if not most) people who been directly
exposed to the dangers of vaccines and/or vaccine injury, are driven to
research the topic and find out the background that is not being publicised by
the establishment, the government or the media. RFK Jr’s website Children’s
Health Defense.org (Facebook will not allow the link to be shared here as part
of their censorship against vaccine truth but you’ll find it easily enough if
you care to look) was not established by this prominent environmental lawyer as
a means to raise controversy - it was established through his efforts to
eradicate environmental toxicity from the US, toxicity that was irresponsibly
being perpetuated by greedy industrialists and the prime focus (initially) was
on mercury from coal-fired power and other industrial plants but through these
endeavours, he found a plethora of women (mothers mostly) who asked him, if his
focus was on mercury, to look at vaccines and the potential dangers they posed.
Most of these women had experienced debilitating injury suffered by their children as a result of vaccines. The demand for this
investigation resulted in RFK Jr expanding his campaign against environmental
toxicity to vaccines and the more he dug into the science, the more frightening
were the revelations, especially the lack of safety. So the populist notion
that anti-vaxx groups are uninformed hippies and airheads is beyond ridiculous
and wholly inaccurate.
-->
