Paul

Paul

SMILEYSKULL

SMILEYSKULL
Half the story is a dangerous thing

DISCLAIMER

All content on this blog is the copyright © of Paul Murray (unless noted otherwise / reposts etc.) and the intellectual property is owned by him, however, the purpose of this forum is to share the content with all who dare to venture here.
The subject matter is adult in nature so those who are easily offended, misunderstand satire, or are generally too uptight to have a good time or even like who they are, it's probably a good idea to leave now.
Enjoy responsibly...

Saturday, 8 February 2020

The most incisive information yet on coronavirus

https://uncoverdc.com/2020/02/07/coronavirus-grips-china/


Story by Celia Farber with research contributions from Tracy Beanz
Part one of an UncoverDC Investigation
It’s breathtaking how we have all become self-invented virologists; how strong our opinions are on “viruses,” and what they have in mind for us. It’s never good. I am known for “denying” the horrors attributed to HIV, which was projected to kill 90 million Americans by 1993, and my denialism brought violent retaliation—but if you check the numbers, I was correct. So were many others, all similarly destroyed for the sin of countering wild fear in an age of viral-mania.
Fear drives markets, and HIV is now a trillion-dollar industry. The level of HIV (measured by questionable technologies) has remained a steady line in the US population since they began measuring. It has not “gone up.” Africa, predicted to be “wiped off the map,” has instead seen a population explosion the same size as the entire US population; over 350 million, since the mid-1980’s.
They (the globalists) have been gunning for the next AIDS for a long time.
Bird flu fizzled, SARS, MERS—all of them fizzled. Now we have a new monster, and we are calling it “corona,” instead of its actual name which is 2019 n-CoV, also known as the “novel” coronavirus. This is indeed a new nightmare, but not necessarily for the reasons we are being told.
Tracy Beanz and I have been studying the “Corona Situation”, as I will call it, and we are ready to separate some wheat from some chaff. Please know that “viruses” are the most dangerous geo-political pieces on the chess board. Globalists know this and have known it since AIDS.
Classical virology, along with classical virologists, were destroyed by AIDS and displaced by industries of population control and control of the earth’s resources. That said, let’s look closely at the “Corona Situation”. The story is directed by mass media, and therefore, we must navigate via media “events.” However, before we can say anything intelligible, we must go back, and set the stage. We must tell the back story, and separate media stories from what is actually happening.
China just locked down 14 million people. Only China can do something on that scale. Someone should tell Bernie Sanders’ lusty socialists that this is precisely what their revered ideology can deliver. That said, we have to presume there is an enormous problem in China. What is the nature of it?
What our Creator calls a “virus” verses what the mass globalist media, UN, Bill Gates, or Laurie Garret call a “virus” are very different. In many cases, “viruses” are technological artifacts, “seen” in the lucrative tests patented to “detect” them, lacking any real scientific rigor or model to find out what- left to their own devices- and without trillion dollar geopolitical warfare and industry, they might actually doto cells.
Viruses are, with few exceptions, benign, harmless, sometimes even helpful. The notion that we must declare “war” on them emerges from the post federal reserve military industrial complex, central to which, is the CDC—a military organization. Some recommended reading: Fear Of The Invisible by Janine Roberts. Roberts revealed that “retroviruses” are in fact helpful DNA messenger systems working to protect us against a barrage of toxic threats.
The idea that “viruses” (especially RNA viruses) have extreme pathogenicity, super-evil intention, high intelligence, and capacity to spread via human contact, is the single greatest concept a globalist controller has at his disposal. So, we proceed with respect for nature, and begin with a quote from Rudolph Steiner, that perfectly addresses the spiritual battle we face.
In 1914, Rudolf Steiner said
“People today are haunted by a fear we can compare with the medieval fear of ghosts.  It is the fear of germs.  … The modern age has lost this belief in the spiritual world; it believes in material things.  It therefore has a fear of material beings, be they ever so small….Germs flourish most intensively when we take nothing but materialistic thoughts into sleep with us…(or) live in the center of an epidemic or endemic illness, and (tend) to think of nothing but the sickness all around, filled only with a fear of getting sick….If this fear can be reduced, even a little by, for example, active love and, while tending the sick, forgetting for a time that one might also be infected, the conditions are less favorable for the germs….If people were given thoughts that lead them away from materialism and spur them on to active love out of the spirit, it would serve the future of humanity better.”  
Presence of the Dead on the Spiritual Path, May 5, 1914 
Rudolf Steiner and Germ Ghosts, 
Dr. Kelly Sutton 
This is important. Viruses have become negative deities in a secular world. If there is a unifying global religion, it is the faith in the necessity of fearing “emerging” viruses, pandemics, “novel” diseases and so forth. Hype, speed, media, guilt, globalism—all of this breaks down foundational epidemiology, which depends on slowness and rigor. With all these new “viral outbreaks,” we can’t distinguish between the media’s movie and reality. Generally lacking? Viral purification, reliable gold-standard testing, causation modeling, and Koch’s Postulates; four principles that must be met before you can state that an organism causes a disease.
So, what do we know for sure?
Coronaviruses are a family of common cold viruses. They were detected in the 1960’s and have likely been “around” since the dawn of mankind. There are said to be seven of them. They all cause cough, fever, headache, and respiratory issues. None have ever been considered highly lethal, though it’s hard to separate them from common pneumonia, which is the leading cause of death from infectious disease in the world.  
The most famous corona-associated illness is SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome.) Another, less famous, was called MERS (Middle East Respiratory Syndrome.) MERS was thought to have originated in camels. For SARS, which “emerged” in China in 2002 and set off its own panic industrial complex, the final statistics were 8,437 cases in 30 countries, 813 deaths. For MERS, identified in Saudi Arabia in 2012, they were 2,494 cases in 27 countries, with 858 deaths. This, despite the fact that Saudi farmers kissed their camels in defiance of government orders to practice “camel avoidance.”
From a 2012 BBC report, this delightful bit:
In recent days, Saudi Arabia has urged people to wear masks and gloves when dealing with camels, to stay away from raw camel meat and camel milk, and not to go near sick animals, the newspaper Gulf News reports. But some people have refused to listen to the government’s advice, posting videos and sending messages in support of camels.
In one video, a man stands between a pair of camels and asks it to sneeze. “Look at me! Sneeze, sneeze! They say there’s Corona in this,” the man says, while hugging and kissing his two camels. Then he shakes one of the camels’ heads and says, “She says no. Is there Corona in you? She says no.” 
In a 2005 paper, coronavirus was described in children hospitalized with respiratory tract infections in the Netherlands, where 9.3% of 300 specimens tested positive for human coronavirus. None died. Ah, you say, but this was not the novel Corona virus. This is true, and the significance of that we will get to shortly.
Pneumonia is the leading cause of death in adults and children in rural China, and the fourth leading cause of death overall. As biochemist Dr. Dave Rasnick points out in a recent interview, 2.8 million to 17 million Chinese die of pneumonia every year.
Still, the narrative about the new coronavirus (2019 nCoV) is this: A “string of mysterious pneumonia cases” appeared in the city of Wuhan, population 11 million, thought (for reasons never explained) to be associated with a seafood market, selling a variety of animals, including live ones. I am not clear what makes one pneumonia “mysterious” but not another, in China.
According to factcheck.org:
“Officials reported the outbreak to the World Health Organization on Dec 31….By Jan. 7, Chinese authorities had isolated 2019 nCoV as the cause of the disease, and shared the genome a few days later. This allowed other countries to test for the virus, and for scientists to begin devising treatments and investigating how the outbreak began.”
The WHO declared the Corona outbreak a “public health emergency” on January 30th.  There are reports of mass cremations, of people being arrested, imprisoned for shooting video inside hospitals; but there is also seemingly state sanctioned video of brave doctors tearfully bidding their families goodbye to march off into certain death on the Corona battle front. It’s never been more important to use the word “ostensibly” in front of every “fact” we believe we see on our screens.
The media landscape is this: legacy media are scolding “conspiracy” theorists for spreading “falsehoods” about the novel coronavirus. Chief among them? That it is a biological weapon that “escaped” a level 4 lab or was possibly stolen by Chinese spies working at level 4 labs in Canada. Said conspiracy theorists, many of them, are citing a draft paper, now retracted, that claimed there were four “HIV inserts” in the nCoV genome; a genome which China shared as soon as it was sequenced. For more information on genomes, you can find that interview mentioned above in a link at the bottom of this piece.
Dr. Francis Boyle of The Council for Responsible Genetics has been featured on InfoWars and other outlets with his theory that this is a bio-weapon, with a fusion of HIV, SARS, and synthetic vectors. He is coining the term “death scientists,” scientists working with the weaponization of organisms, who seek out pathogens to DNA splice, enhance, and reverse engineer with vaccines. “The whole synthetic biology field has been financed by The Pentagon, for biological warfare purposes,” he told Owen Shroyer, pointing out that there is a BSL-4 lab in Wuhan.
My point does not necessarily conflict with his: My point is that none of this goes on in nature. The Globalists’ evil is precisely that they impose upon nature their own dark works. The effect is to displace that which is nature, creation, which aims always at life, with something that aims always at death.
This is, in my mind, the great danger.
I don’t deny that any weaponized pathogen could cause a “pandemic.” I deny that a coronavirus as seen in medical literature past and present shows any signs of sudden death pathogenic impact, and possibly even more so one that was briefly reported to contain “HIV”. As a scholar of twenty years on the topic of HIV, I speak from a position of some stature.
The other conspiracy theorists are being derided over the notion that corona scare is a prelude for a vaccine that already exists. Here it gets interesting. The best way to find truth in this arena is to look at the admonishment and derision in mainstream media and investigate the opposite. There is always a very precise way you are meant to respond to viral terror campaigns, to be a good person, appropriately aware of the threat.
A January 25th USA Today article scolds:
“Following the outbreak of a respiratory disease caused by a new coronavirus in Wuhan, China in December and the announcement of the first American case Jan. 21, several groups and individuals are circulating false rumors on Facebook about the mystery pathogen.
Numerous posts claim the virus has been patented — and some even suggest, incorrectly, that the virus was made in a lab and a vaccine already exists.
“The new fad disease called the ‘coronavirus’ is sweeping headlines,” one Facebook posttaken from Twitter, reads.
Another, which was shared by others, and is part of a series of false coronavirus posts, proclaims that the virus is “‘new’ yet it was lab created and patented in 2015 (in development since 03’).
In fact, there is no vaccine yet available for the new coronavirus, which for now goes by the unwieldy moniker of 2019 novel coronavirus, or 2019-nCoV. And there is no patent related to the new virus, either.”
This makes it sound like no vaccines exist for any coronavirus. In fact, the US developed a vaccine for SARS, and it was used in China. To wit, from HowStuffWorks:
“In 2004, U.S. researchers successfully gave a SARS vaccine to mice in a trial. The researchers later exposed these mice to the actual SARS vaccine; they found that these mice had very few virus particles in their lungs compared to mice who never received the SARS vaccine. This type of vaccine is much safer than other vaccines that are commonly used, as it uses DNA, rather than killed forms of the actual virus, such as in the conventional flu vaccine.
In China, in 2004, researchers successfully vaccinated people with the SARS vaccine. They found that there were very few side effects associated with the vaccine. Researchers claim that an effective and approved SARS vaccine takes three to five years to produce. There is hope, therefore, that if there is another SARS outbreak in the future, the world will be well-equipped with an effective vaccine[source: SciDevNet].”
On Del Bigtree’s show The Highwire, scientist James Lyons-Weiler from The Institute for Applied Knowledge stepped forward and said he had analyzed the new Corona virus’ entire genetic sequence and found a “weird element.” He said:
I’ve analyzed the entire genome sequence of this and compared to the entire genome sequence of all the other coronavirus….There is this weird element that doesn’t belong there. I have found that it actually did match a vector technology that was from the 1998, that was the first time it was published in the National Academy of Sciences. This victor technology is a mechanism by which molecular biologists insert new genes into viruses and bacteria. It’s really unusual to find a vector technology in a virus that is circulating among humans. So one thing we can say for certain is this particular virus has a laboratory origin. It should not be in the wild. If you take that sequence and compare it to other proteins that it encodes we find that it is actually a SARS protein that was put into coronavirus for the purpose of making the vaccine work better.”
I would implore you to visit Dr. Lyons-Weiler’s website and take a read through some of the research done into this recent outbreak. Eye opening, for sure. There will be more we address here. Much more, in fact.
Put simply, the SARS scare led to a SARS vaccine. The new coronavirus has a “weird element” that is an “insert,” or “vector technology” that is a “SARS protein,” that was supposed to make the vaccine work better. The mystery is, why is a coronavirus, a family of viruses which cause respiratory distress but are not commonly fatal, (basically cold viruses) and have been around seemingly forever, suddenly causing China to shut down, leading to global panic?
I found five words in a PLoS paper from 2006, that worried me. The paper is called “Vaccine Efficacy In Senescent Mice Challenged with Recombinant SARS-CoV Bearing Epidemic and Zoonotic Spike Variants”. The five words are: “…pathological changes in the lungs.” Never mind that it worried me, it worried the authors of the paper. They wrote:
“The researchers created vaccines based on SARS-CoV S and SARS-CoV N by taking the genes coding for those proteins and inserting them into another type of virus particle that acted as a delivery vehicle. They injected mice with these vaccines and then tested whether the mice generated an immune response against the specific SARS proteins, which they did. The next step was to work out whether mice injected with the vaccines would be protected against later infection with SARS-CoV. The researchers found that mice injected with vaccine based on SARS-CoV S were protected against later infection with a standard SARS-CoV strain, both in the short term (eight weeks after vaccination) and the long term (54 weeks after vaccination). However, the vaccine based on SARS-CoV N did not seem to result in protection, and, worryingly, caused pathological changes in the lungs of mice following virus challenge.” (emphasis added) 
If we are looking at a bio-lab catastrophe here, it seems likely the catastrophe was caused by genetic tampering gone wrong. What happens to Chinese people, vaccinated with SARS vaccine, who are then re-exposed to a coronavirus? Is this what is making this coronavirus so deadly? Or, is it deadly? Is it deadly only in Chinese? Have any non-Chinese died? The literature on 2019 n-CoV does not reflect catastrophic pathogenicity that would explain events in China. We must also factor in that we don’t know what the true death toll is, nor can we know who to trust. We are dealing with the nation of China; a communist authoritarian society not well known for truthfulness in information, especially when that information could be detrimental to their image.
In a paper titled Corona Virus Panic, David Crowe, who hosts a podcast called The Infectious Myth, and heads the largely ignored think tank “Rethinking AIDS,” established in the early 90’s to give voice to the many scientists objecting to Robert Gallo’s infectious HIV/AIDS hypothesis, the following puzzling facts were cited about actual Corona cases:
“The symptom onset date of the first patient identified was Dec 1, 2019. None of his family members developed fever or any respiratory symptoms. No epidemiological link was found between the first patient and later cases.
Crowe has broken down cluster groups exposed to 2019 n-CoV.  In an email to UncoverDC, he said:
“In one paper trying to establish a transmission chain, one of the important people in the chain, who did get quite sick, tested negative despite 18 different samples being tested in various ways. While her son, the 10-year-old, was positive without clinical symptoms.
In another paper trying to establish a transmission chain, three German employees tested positive after meeting with a healthy Chinese woman whose first symptoms were on the plane back to China. Two of those three had no major illness. The third had something similar to a flu, took 3 days off work (not knowing at this time about the Chinese woman’s diagnosis), took no special precautions, and came back to work the same day the Chinese woman informed the company she’d tested positive.”
Well that’s interesting.
Either the test is useless, or Germans are immune.
At Factcheck.org, I found this:
“Most corona viruses that infect humans are relatively benign and cause mild respiratory diseases such as the common cold,” said Susan Weiss, a corona virus researcher at the University of Pennsylvania, in a phone interview.”
The reported case fatality rate of 2019 nCoV is around 2-3%, as compared to 10% for SARS. There have been a handful of cases in the United States, people returning from China, and one transmission between a married couple in close proximity. All so far have had mild symptoms and recovered.
Again, according to Fact Check.org:
“Initial reports indicate that while healthy people can fall seriously ill, deaths are largely confined to older folks and those with pre-existing conditions such a diabetes, Parkinson’s disease and liver cirrhosis.” 
From reporting, this does not appear to be a “level 4” pathogen. Neither particularly infectious nor particularly pathogenic. But why then, would China elect to quarantine 14 million and shut down its own economy? Something is very, very wrong here.
I happened upon—who else—Laurie Garrett (CFR, Bill Gates’ favorite author) on a talk show the other day, setting us straight about coronavirus. She was honest enough to admit coronaviruses are one of two common families of cold viruses, then she advised the usual precautions: hand washing, gloves, and avoidance of human contact. When asked about that part by one of the hosts, a change came over her. Her voice became louder, and she grew extra animated when she said, in an almost irritated tone of voice: “We call it social distancing.”
We do?
How many millions of dollars in Globalist slush funds did it take for them to produce that little gem of social engineering?
None of the deferential hosts challenged her on the long list of plagues she has peddled that failed to materialize, including AIDS, Bird Flu, SARS, Zika–
Here’s a classic Laurie Garrett lede, from a 2005 article in Foreign Affairs titled The Next Pandemic?
“Scientists have long forecast the appearance of an influenza virus capable of infecting 40 percent of the world’s human population and killing unimaginable numbers. Recently, a new strain, H5N1 avian influenza, has shown all the earmarks of becoming that disease. Until now, it has largely been confined to certain bird species, but that may be changing.”
And this graph is also a classic:
“In short, doom may loom. But note the “may.” If the relentlessly evolving virus becomes capable of human-to-human transmission, develops a power of contagion typical of human influenzas, and maintains its extraordinary virulence, humanity could well face a pandemic unlike any ever witnessed. Or nothing at all could happen. Scientists cannot predict with certainty what this H5N1 influenza will do.”
Yes, Laurie, we note the “may.” It’s one of your favorite words. A great many things “may” happen, but media ought to devote itself to what has happened.
Johns Hopkins University has launched a “visualization tool,” to help you see all the countries where Corona cases turn up. The CDC has also “…launched its own state and global maps to show the location of confirmed cases.”
And what’s more? Every single detail of the script for this corona “pandemic” was foreshadowed in the CDC-backed Soderberg propaganda film Contagion, in 2011: The virus originates from Hong Kong. People keel over dead. It came from bats. The CDC recommends “social distancing.” It is feared to be a biological weapon. It trashes “conspiracy theorists” and people who peddle “herbs” and “snake oil” on the internet. Public quarantines are imposed. It was filmed literally on the grounds (Druid Hills) of CDC headquarters in Atlanta, EIS officers were script consultants, as well as CDC, and Laurie Garrett, Lawrence Brilliant, the WHO, W. Ian Lipkin and a host of other plague luminaries. Scientists praised the ghastly movie—even Paul Offit loved it.
It was produced by Jeffrey Skoll’s Participant Productions “dedicated to entertainment intended to spur social change.” And its budget was a whopping $60 million.
There are many ways to interpret the mass quarantine in China. Most media, and NIH’s Anthony Fauci, have taken Chinese action as an indication of a coming “pandemic.” But the Chinese are already suggesting the worst is over–that early detection and “timely quarantine,” while waiting out the incubation period will end the crisis. Zhong Nanshan, described as a “renowned Chinese respiratory expert,” has said the death rate can be expected to drop soon. Unlike HIV, the Chinese themselves have promised this will not be rolled out as a “forever virus”, but rather, as Nanshan says, “Those without clinical symptoms do not actually have the disease.” That means it likely won’t become a parallel monetary system, like the HIV industry.
But that doesn’t mean the trillion dollar HIV industry isn’t getting in on the action. A combination of two anti-HIV drugs is being used to treat novel corona patients, which is alarming, as it could peg highly toxic drugs to a lung related illness that scientists, by their own admission, don’t have really any answers about. That is worrying many scientists in the field, and many of them are sounding the alarm. We’ve already established that up to 17 million Chinese die of pneumonia (as opposed to “mysterious pneumonia”) every year. I still do not understand what made these pneumonia cases stand out, leading to the lock-down and the global panic. HIV drugs are certainly not indicated as first line treatment for pneumonia.
Globalists like global diseases and pandemics. They love contagion and nothing else. Environmentally induced illnesses don’t interest them at all. All their conferences, grants, NGO’s, galas– all of that depends upon contagion as religion. A curious and off-putting faith in the invisible viral deity’s capacity to do supernatural things we can’t see yet.
Nobody should listen to a word Anthony Fauci says, that much is certain. He has yet to come clean that none of his propaganda about HIV’s sexual spread has panned out, never mind its lack of purification, pathogenicity, etc. A 10-year study was done that Tony Fauci would prefer we never mention. Known as the “Padian study,” it was a study to see how infectious HIV was. The focus was on HIV antibodies. In the study were 175 “discordant” couples, one HIV positive, one HIV negative. The couples had sex freely and often unprotected over a 10 year period. No seroconversions were observed. Padian has express fury at “deniers” who cite her study as proof the HIV theory is wrong. But the study is hard to deny or erase from history. All they can ever do is destroy the messengers.
We don’t know what is going in in China—not yet. It’s clear that something is very wrong, and that it has lots of people, from government bureaucrats to the citizens experiencing these conditions in China, to our elected officials, and even the CDC, confused. The only question is, what exactly are they confused about? Does anybody have the script or are we working from a tear in the globalist’s tightly spun fabric?
Or better to say: Straight-jacket.
This is a continuing series from UncoverDC. Please continue to check back here for new information. To read more of Celia’s work on HIV, and view the full interview with Dr. David Rasnick, please click here.
Celia Farber is s a contributor to UncoverDC and The Epoch Times, and has in the past written for Harper’s, Esquire, Rolling Stone and more. Having been gravely injured in legacy media, she never wants to go back. She is the recipient of the Semmelweis International Society Clean Hands Award For Investigative Journalism, the author of “Serious Adverse Events: An Uncensored History of AIDS”. She is also the editor of The Truth Barrier, an investigative and literary website.

Friday, 8 November 2019

VACCINES - WHY THE VOLATILITY?





Whenever this topic is raised, the supporters of vaccination become almost rabid in their defence of the drugs as if to not vaccinate and have a choice about that is somehow the most dangerous, irresponsible thing imaginable.
It truly isn’t.
What is asserted by the media, the medical establishment and particularly the pharmaceutical industry itself is the following:

1.     Vaccines are safe - they have been rigorously tested
2.     Vaccines do not cause autism
3.     Vaccination, when up around 95%+ uptake confers “herd immunity”
4.     Unvaccinated kids pose a threat to vaccinated kids
5.     To not vaccinate your children is akin to giving them a death sentence
6.     Vaccines eradicated polio and smallpox
7.     The establishment (and the pharmaceutical industry) would not lie about vaccines - that would be unethical
8.     Mercury has been removed from all vaccines
9.     The anti-vaccination movement is a recent and dangerous fad peopled by uninformed, hysterical pseudoscientists and hippies who get their bogus information from the internet and social media




1. Vaccines are safe.

Very hard to make this claim empirically when no vaccine has ever been subjected to a double blind inert placebo safety trial. They simply have not been tested in this way. As modern vaccines were originally developed in a fast-track mode to “combat” the threat of biological warfare, they were conveniently reclassified from the status of drugs to “biologics” thereby bypassing the need for long-term (years-long) safety trials as is mandatory with all other drugs. Vaccines can go from lab to pharmacy in as little as weeks with no double-blind inert placebo testing whatsoever. The establishment will tell you that it is unethical to withhold “life-saving” drugs from the public and children in particular or to run trials where measles is tested, however, they have no problem issuing drugs to market that have not been safety tested on any study group whatsoever with no way of knowing or predicting the potential harm. Studies are regularly yet meaninglessly done using a previous version of a vaccine as a baseline for the new vaccine - that is not recognised science - that is junk science and would be rejected in peer review for any drug other than vaccines. Many pro-vaccine articles and blogs etc. do, however, attempt to debunk the statement that vaccines do not undergo double-blind inert placebo safety trials and cite links to so-called double blind inert placebo studies, but when investigated, 99% of them are, in fact controlled vaccine v vaccine studies, which proves nothing without an inceptual baseline on the first vaccine, which has never been done. That’s the point.

Therefore there is no scientifically documented risk profile for a single commercial vaccine

The DTP vaccine (in clinical trials - vaccinated v unvaccinated) returned a 10 times greater risk of death in infants who were vaccinated (from other causes) than the unvaccinated cohort.

According to the CDC website, children who were born prior to 1989 (when the vaccine schedule was dramatically ramped up) have only a 12% chance of contracting a chronic illness (as listed on the vaccine inserts and their website) whereas, children born after 1989 who were subjected to the new increased schedule, have a 54% chance of contracting one of these chronic illnesses. (But nothing to do with the vaccines, even though these illnesses are all listed as adverse reactions to the vaccines.)

Since the advent of the vaccine injury compensation fund in 1986 (and even though vaccine makers are exempt from prosecution regardless of the lack of safety or how serious the damage the vaccine may cause - even death) over $4billion has been paid out to victims of vaccine injury, many of these listed as ASD injuries. Startlingly, however, since doctors and hospitals derive huge financial benefits from Big Pharma, less than 5% of true vaccine injuries are actually formally recorded as such. If they were, the cases and payouts would be off the charts - ergo, the stats and the factual reality is grossly downplayed.

Vaccines can and do cause serious chronic adverse side-effects including ASD (autism) and other permanent neurological disabilities and death as well as a host of autoimmune diseases, cancer, development disorders, allergies, asthma - the list is extensive. The place that you will see the statistics of current chronic ailments afflicting US children is on the CDC website. The other place you will find this exact same list is in the vaccine inserts. Coincidence? Extremely unlikely.

The reported incidence of cervical cancer in young women and girls through the administering of the HPV vaccine, is shockingly high yet is downplayed in the media for obvious reasons. This vaccine is regularly and tragically destroying young women’s lives quite unnecessarily. [3]

The flu vaccine is ineffective and while the package inserts state that the vaccine will not give you flu, the side effects are listed as: headaches, nausea, coughing, runny nose, joint pains - in fact, all the symptoms of flu - fancy that. But it’s not flu - just feels like it. Oh, and many of the flu vaccines still have mercury in them.

2. Vaccines do not cause autism

Vaccines can and do cause a range of ASD’s and the vaccine makers assert as much in their package inserts so the populist platitude by the establishment that vaccines definitely do not cause autism is as bogus as the safety claims. The makers of the drugs even admit this. Doctors and/or the media and/or the government and/or the regulators either don’t know what they’re talking about, which is of extreme concern or they do and they are blatantly lying to the public, which is an even bigger concern.

The Vaccine Court has paid out numerous vaccine injury cases where autism was listed as the injury sustained. Ergo, the legal system has also ruled that vaccines can and do cause autism.

3. Vaccination, when up around 95%+ uptake confers “herd immunity”

This is patently and provably false. Many studies and reported events have demonstrated that vaccinated cohorts of the population where the uptake is as high as 98% does not automatically confer a so-called herd-immunity to the rest of the cohort. In fact, it is very often the case that the vaccinated members of the group contract the illnesses against which they have been vaccinated. This is particularly prevalent with measles and mumps but seldom, if ever, reported in the mainstream media.

Even entirely vaccinated cohorts (such was the case recently on a US naval vessel - the USS Fort McHenry) contract the diseases against which they have been vaccinated - in the case in point - mumps, where the ship could not put into harbour for several weeks until the epidemic had passed. [1]

What is, however, unarguable, is the fact that non-vaccinated kids who contract measles and/or other diseases naturally, will, once the illness has been dealt with by the body’s immune system, enjoy lifelong immunity from the contracted disease. Conversely, once a chemical vaccine has been administered, the body is reliant on frequent booster shots throughout one’s lifetime to maintain so-called immunity from the disease.

4. Unvaccinated kids pose a threat to vaccinated kids

If vaccines are effective in protecting those who receive them, there should be no logical reason whatsoever why an unvaccinated person should pose any form of threat to the vaccinated.

If however, as statistics have shown, the vaccinated still contract the diseases against which they have been vaccinated, then the infected vaccinated members of the group pose as much if not more of a threat to the group as the unvaccinated arguably might do.

Having said that, multiple studies measuring general health and wellbeing between vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts of the community, repeatedly show that the unvaccinated are by far healthier than the unvaccinated and far less likely to fall prey to the previously mentioned chronic lifetime ailments that beset the vaccinated cohort of the community. Yet the governments refuse to conduct a mass vaccinated v unvaccinated study despite the fact that they have the database at their disposal with government mandated medical records. The results of this study would kill this debate once and for all. [2]

5. To not vaccinate your children is akin to giving them a death sentence

This is patently false as the general approach to vaccination has been to “prevent” innocuous childhood ailments such as measles, mumps, chickenpox, and the like, all of which, although highly infectious, are minor illnesses for which natural immunity is adequately equipped to address, besides which, as noted, natural contraction of these illnesses will (in most cases) confer lifetime immunity.

It is a statistical reality that sanitation and improved hygiene and living standards throughout the world, reduced (and virtually eradicated) most of these illnesses decades, if not centuries ago prior to the introduction of vaccines.

It is not necessary to vaccinate a newborn baby against hepatitis unless the mother is a carrier of the virus and then again, there is every likelihood that the child’s natural immune system will cope with the virus accordingly as has occurred since time immemorial.

6. Vaccines eradicated polio and smallpox

This has been assumed as empirical fact through forced repetition of the assertion, however, once again it is mere populist perception rather than fact and is patently and demonstrably false.

Aside from a raft of issues with the polio vaccine including contamination with simian virus and cancer-causing cells, the disease has never been eradicated, although its prevalence was on dramatic decline before the introduction of the vaccine. Currently in the western and the developing world, variant strains of (polio)myelitis are not uncommon, thus the disease still exists but has simply been renamed in the interests of perpetuating a false perception as to the efficacy of the original vaccine. [4]

The original case for vaccination - a cure for smallpox as promoted by the father of vaccines, Edward Jenner, occurred with no understanding of bacterial and viral infection, thus no vaccine science actually existed. It was all pure trial and error experimentation - but you have to start somewhere, right? The idea was to culture cowpox virus (it was rumoured that milkmaids who had been exposed to cowpox seemed less susceptible to smallpox) and inject small amounts of it into humans to assist them in building antibodies (which were unknown at that stage) to smallpox. In order to test the theory, on May 14, 1796, he removed some fluid from a dairy maid named Sarah (Nelmes) and then injected it into the arm of James Phipps, a healthy 8-year old boy. … Phipps contracted cowpox, and six weeks later Jenner injected him with smallpox, in which he took the fluid from an actual pock. When James did not come down with smallpox, Jenner concluded that cowpox protects the human constitution from the infection of smallpox. This indeed is the basis upon which the entire field of vaccination rests. What is seldom mentioned in the popular retelling of this story is that Jenner re-vaccinated James Phipps 20 times, and that Phipps died of tuberculosis when he was 20 years old. Jenner also vaccinated his 11-month-old son Edward at least twice. Young Edward Jenner was reported to have had a bad reaction to the smallpox vaccination his father gave him and shown signs of “mild mental retardation.” He also succumbed to tuberculosis when he was 21 years old. It is interesting to note that tuberculosis has been linked to the smallpox vaccine. Alexander Wilder, MD, professor of pathology and former editor of The New York Medical Times said in the 19th century: “Vaccination is the infusion of a contaminating element into the system, and after such contamination you can never be sure of regaining the former purity of the body. Consumption (tuberculosis) follows in the wake of vaccination as certainly as effect follows cause.”

Moreover, smallpox attained its maximum mortality after vaccination was introduced. The mean annual mortality to 10,000 population from 1850 to 1869 was at the rate of 2.04, whereas in 1871 the death rate was 10.24 and in 1872 the death rate was 8.33, and this after the most laudable efforts to extend vaccination by legislative enactments. The fairytale legend of a country doctor making a discovery that saved the world from the devastation of smallpox is a fundamental medical belief that continues to be echoed by indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a pillar of their vaccine faith. But the true history shows us a different reality. [5]

7. The establishment (and the pharmaceutical industry) would not lie about vaccines - that would be unethical

They can and they do lie and it is indeed unethical, however, the majority of clinicians maintain a firm “belief” in vaccines despite a plethora of science and mounting physical evidence in the field that vaccines can and do cause incalculable harm to tens of thousands of people, impacting many of them for life and even causing death. As has been demonstrated, repetition of a false statement by authorities and media such as “vaccines are safe” merely makes the statement widely heard, not factual.

The establishment also goes to extreme lengths to shut down any debate on this issue through (all) media and refuses to engage scientists and medical experts in public debates on vaccination. One has to ask oneself - if the “science is settled” as is claimed, why would there be any need to refuse a public debate when this should surely shut up the vaccine skeptics once and for all? Could it be that the science is not settled and the establishment is afraid of the revelations that would become public knowledge?

Given that vaccines (especially in the cases of the minor childhood ailments so frequently at the centre of this issue: measles, mumps, rubella, chickenpox etc.) are demonstrably unnecessary for children when innate natural immunity is more than able to cope with these ailments, it would seem strange that such militant vehemence to “force” these drugs on the public is evident. This is exemplified by no-jab-no-school and no-jab-no-benefits policies in various countries where social/educational or financial punishment is threatened if parents refuse to vaccinate their children. This can only be described as medical tyranny - fascism - where the right to freedom of informed choice is removed from ordinary citizens, this on the pretext of being in the interest of public health, which is spurious in the extreme. It is in the interest of obscene profit and repeat business when vaccine-damaged victims are required to buy medication for life as a result of the chronic ailments suffered as the side-effects of vaccination.

What is even more staggering, is the fact that while vaccine injury can be (and very often is) proven through the onerous legal process, in the US, the manufacturers of the vaccines cannot be directly sued (they are legally exempt from liability) and no matter how serious the injury or how unsafe the product, they bear no responsibility. Not even when it comes to compensation. That is derived from a taxpayer funded budget - in other words, one gets to compensate oneself for the benefit of having been damaged by a drug company and that company gets off Scot free and has no incentive or compulsion to change the product that is causing the harm. This model would sit comfortably in the domain of organised crime (for that’s what this is) rather than in the public health sector where the Hippocratic Oath’s first tenet of Doing No Harm has fallen completely by the wayside.

The industry lies about these drugs to such a degree, employing pro-vaccine trolls and shills to promote the deception and shut down social media debates on the issue as well as shame any parent claiming a vaccine-injured child when under any circumstance other than vaccines, the doctor will take the word of the parent as the prime reference to infant health. One has to ask why this is? Is it perhaps that the vaccine business in the US alone grosses over $50 billion per annum and this is nothing compared with the treatment of the epidemic of chronic illnesses rife among the current American children (unknown prior to 1989 when the schedule was ramped up) which exceeds $500 billion per annum - mostly an annuity income for the industry for every victim’s life. The amounts are absolutely staggering. And if that is not worth lying and cheating for, I guess nothing is - even though they’re supposed to be doing this for public health not private profit.

8. Mercury has been removed from all vaccines

After years of debate around (unbelievably) the toxicity of mercury (as if this is somehow surprising), the pharmaceutical industry, for the most part, removed Thimerosal (the mercury-based preservative) from most of the childhood vaccines. But not from all of the flu shots. One has to ask why? Mercury is one of the most powerful neurotoxins known to man and yet for decades it was used in vaccines in quantities far in excess of any EPA listed safety levels. And these were being injected into day-old babies willy-nilly. [8]

Although they continued to claim that ethyl-mercury was “harmless’ manufacturers began voluntarily removing Thimerosal from pediatric vaccines around 2000. It is assumed that most pediatric vaccines containing Thimerosal were “off the shelves” by 2003. (No vaccines were recalled.) Even so, most infants are still routinely given Thimerosal-containing influenza vaccine even though there are Thimerosal-free and vaccines with trace amounts of Thimerosal. Infants receiving a Thimerosal-containing influenza vaccine are dosed at 6 months with 12.5 mcg of ethyl mercury and at 7 months with an additional 12.5 mcg. Adult Thimerosal-containing vaccines contain roughly 25mcg. All of these Thimerosal-containing version exceed federal safety guidelines [7]

It was deemed unsafe for pregnant mothers to eat mercury-rich tuna fish where the mercury content was far below that of the childhood vaccines, yet it was okay for the latter to be injected into newborn babies. In defence of this, Paul Offit (US Professor of vaccinology, owner of multiple vaccine patents and vocal defender of vaccinology) was heard to say that Thimerosal was the “safe” mercury and this type of mercury left the body safely within a week of vaccination. While it is true it say that no traces of mercury were found in the excreta, urine, blood, sweat, hair or nails of the recently vaccinated babies tested, further independent tests on lab animals (similarly injected) found the mercury had not left the body at all - it had merely gone to the brain where, when synthesising to organic mercury compound, it caused devastating and irreversible harm and mental retardation. This was what was also happening to the babies. Yet Offit was firm in his “belief” in the good old vaccines, even going as far as to say that babies’ immune systems could easily withstand 10,000 vaccine shots at any one time. He actually said this. And he’s The vaccine boss so no arguing with Paul. [6]

9. The anti-vaccination movement is a recent and dangerous fad peopled by uninformed, hysterical pseudoscientists and hippies who get their bogus information from the internet and social media

False on every count. The anti-vaccination movement has been live and well since the time of Edward Jenner when he first launched his questionable “preventative modality” on the public.

The science, while being far from “settled” as the mainstream would have one believe, is solidly tilted in favour of those who question vaccine safety. It is also more accurate to say that many people active in this safer vaccine campaign were, more often than is credited, once pro-vaccine and had their children on the current vaccine schedule and as the result of their own negative experiences with vaccines or further research, have opted to question the safety associated with vaccines as the information that is provided through the mainstream is, unarguably inaccurate at best and downright misleading in many cases. So not everyone can nor should they be tagged with this hysterical pejorative anti-vax title when, in fact they are simply pro-safe-vaccines.

Contrary to media-fuelled populist perception, many (if not most) people who been directly exposed to the dangers of vaccines and/or vaccine injury, are driven to research the topic and find out the background that is not being publicised by the establishment, the government or the media. RFK Jr’s website Children’s Health Defense.org (Facebook will not allow the link to be shared here as part of their censorship against vaccine truth but you’ll find it easily enough if you care to look) was not established by this prominent environmental lawyer as a means to raise controversy - it was established through his efforts to eradicate environmental toxicity from the US, toxicity that was irresponsibly being perpetuated by greedy industrialists and the prime focus (initially) was on mercury from coal-fired power and other industrial plants but through these endeavours, he found a plethora of women (mothers mostly) who asked him, if his focus was on mercury, to look at vaccines and the potential dangers they posed. Most of these women had experienced debilitating injury suffered by their children as a result of vaccines. The demand for this investigation resulted in RFK Jr expanding his campaign against environmental toxicity to vaccines and the more he dug into the science, the more frightening were the revelations, especially the lack of safety. So the populist notion that anti-vaxx groups are uninformed hippies and airheads is beyond ridiculous and wholly inaccurate.


-->