COVERT-19 SUMMARY

 

People should understand that PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) IS NOT A TEST - it is an analytical process that amplifies a small fragment of genetic material for the purpose of study. 

It was never intended to be used as a testing protocol nor for diagnostical purposes or to determine viral load.

Its inventor, Kary Mullis is on record stating as much.

He warned against it being used for viral detection for HIV when the establishment wanted to use it for that. 

Kary Mullis video:

And nothing about PCR has changed. 

What HAS changed is that Kary Mullis is now sadly deceased (2019 just before the great COVERT scamdemic) and he cannot speak out against this misuse of his incredible invention. And that in his absence with no authoritative dissenting voice, the establishment has gone back to its disingenuous ways and is using the procedure in an entirely inappropriate manner - to “diagnose” COVERT-19 

There are other scientists who have provided empirical peer-reviewed papers on the inconsistencies of PCR for this “purpose” so it’s not that the information isn’t out there - it is - just not through the mainstream media of course. 

The CDC and even the WHO have admitted on their websites that a range of amplification on the process that’s (deemed arbitrarily by them to be) too many - will render positive results every time, where up to 97% of these results will be false positives. But guess what - up until very recently, that’s still what they’ve been doing. All over the world. 

Which, in simple terms means: at those amplification cycles nearly everyone they test will be positive whether they are sick, healthy or otherwise. And as Kary Mullis has repeatedly stated: PCR doesn’t test you for virus.

Think about this for a moment - the ENTIRE basis for broadcasting to the populations of every country that there is a widespread rate of infection and the number of “infected” people is in the millions - IS BASED ON AN ENTIRELY BOGUS TESTING PROTOCOL.

So whereas they might claim there are 500,000 COVERT cases on the go - that actually translates in reality to maybe 15,000 actual flu-like cases and the rest of the people tested (485,000) are healthy and are certainly not Asymptomatic (i.e. - not showing symptoms but are carriers of the “disease”) - that too is bogus and there are  empirical studies to prove it. In 2020 onward, healthy has suddenly been (conveniently) mistranslated to now mean asymptomatic. 

It is all a pack of utter nonsense. 

And yet - here we are.

And people keep asking - why would they do this? 

Why would they lie to us?

To what end?

And I say (again) - most of the people in the front line do not know any better - hell, they prescribe and administer vaccines with the best of intentions too firmly believing them to be rigorously tested life saving medications whereas the reality is simply that not a single vaccine on the planet (show me a Pubmed paper that proves me wrong) has ever been double-blind-inert-placebo tested to prove its safety and efficacy - not one. But the pharmaceutical companies will state that they HAVE been safety tested. And some using placebos.

And that is true - to a point. But there is no baseline as the “placebos” they are using are not harmless sugar pills or saline shots - they are OTHER VACCINES which in turn have never been safety trialed against an actual INERT placebo, which is the GOLD STANDARD for any drug that requires to be safety tested properly. Most of your doctors will argue against this saying that the vaccines they’re givng your children have ALL been rigorously safety tested but they are wrong. They are just wrong.

So it’s no real stretch to see this scenario unfolding with COVERT-19 where the “authorities” (who have got every prediction and assertion regarding infection and mortality wrong and continue to mislead people about it) at the front line simply believe that what they are doing is the right thing to do.

It isn’t. It’s literally DEAD wrong. 

And the lockdown (not the virus) attrition proves this. 

With HIV they killed and/or maimed millions with toxic ARV drugs and summarily blamed that attrition on the little AIDS “virus” - that was the precursor to what we are experiencing now. 

Link to article in Spin magazine

Vaccines have a similar attrition rate only it’s being kept very firmly under the radar where vaccine injury and death is downplayed everywhere because that narrative doesn’t suit the manufacturers of those meds.
If vaccines were so wonderfully safe then why in 1983 would the industry have petitioned the US government to afford them blanket exemption from legal prosecution?
I’ll tell you why - because they were losing so much money through the incessant lawsuits when their products injured and/or killed (mostly) children during those years. They threatened the US government that they would stop making vaccines if something wasn’t done. And President Reagan buckled - in 1986 he initiated the vacccine injury compensation act and legislated that the drug companies could not be sued. Can you imagine that?
No?

Vaccine compensation act

Well, it’s all true - that’s how safe they are. And when reclassified around the same time, to becoming biologics rather than “drugs” long term safety trials were no longer necessary. Look this up for yourself. All true. 

Difference between drugs and biologics

The AIDS industry has been worth trillions in aid, drugs, testing kits and even marketing (which is where bogus diagnosis first began with Elisa antibody testing) and this deadly pantomime is being played out once more - this time, instead of just gay men and impoverished third world people being the target cohort of a supposedly deadly virus,  an entire global population is now at the mercy of those who seek to exploit and profit from this deception.

This is no theory - this is verifiably researchable but the mainstream still maintains the deception about HIV being the (probable) cause of AIDS because, guess what(?) - just like SARS-Cov2, that sneaky little HI-Virus was never isolated or purified either and the man at the centre of that world-changing event and the first time anybody had ever really heard the word “pandemic” was one Anthony Fauci.

Do the math. Stop believing that authorities don’t lie or deceive - they do for profit and power grabbing and have done so since the species learned how to walk upright. 

Every single manufacturer of vaccines has been convicted numerously of fraud and wilful and wrongful death of millions of innocent civilians over the years but those are merely statistics in their actuarial calculations where profit is measured against potential losses through lawsuits when their drugs cause injury or death. And if the profit is viable, then so is the harm they know will be caused. It’s business. 

It’s not a curing game - it’s a numbers and profit game and hey - if they can cull a few million people at the same time (something that our mate, Mr Gates has proclaimed on many occasions - gleefully I might add - is really necessary - it’s not) then for the profiteers - that is a bonus. Some say it is the main part of the elite agenda and they may be right - it doesn’t matter. The profiteering alone just through test kits and vaccines (the ultimate end game and biggest earner - Gates is on record stating that too) is self evident. Do the math - follow the money 7+ billion people x 3 - 6 shots of experimental poison at arguably around 1,000 a shot is a shit ton of money - it’s actually around $43.2 trillion - that’s just the vaccines - $43,200,000,000,000 - you can hardly write that number out never mind count it...

And you still think this is about your health....?

Come on.

Rampant technocratic Transhumanism

 

To “live” vicariously in the digital realm because the reality we currently experience sucks.... that’s the message. 

Fuckerberg was spouting this stuff back in 2017 on his path to creating a way for humankind to subsist (I refuse to use the word exist) in a simulated digital reality, much in the manner of the characters in Avatar or the Bruce Willis movie, Surrogate. 

Life devolves to becoming a catatonic lump in a chair, hooked up to the digital realm through a VR interface where one can “live” and adventure safely. 

Sounds just peachy, right. Because the planet outside really sucks. 

Think about what’s playing out right now about people being systematically separated and forced into isolation. It’s all based on a bogus premise but man it has been effective. Coincidence of course. 

Fuckerberg noted: 

'This will help us mix the physical and digital in new ways, and make reality better'.

And:

'We'll start today with basic effect such as face masks.’

It’s just a game, right? 

Sure. 

Come on, people. Wake up and smell the covert revolution and the war on your very consciousness. 

I for one, ain’t falling for it. 

How about you? 

Link to article:

Covert-19 tyranny by stealth

 

Stock photos with multiple uses...

They were wheeling bodies from Central Park to morgues at the outset of the covert-19 scamdemic....not. There were emergency rooms and hospitals overflowing everywhere even in Canada around the world as it progressed - not. 

In Canada mayoral authority was proclaiming such things completely unfoundedly, as true journalists exposed - in other words the authorities were lying. 

Let’s call it what it is - THEY WERE AND CONTINUE TO FUCKING LIE. 

They even in the US are obfuscating the number of deaths by trying to separate out covert-19 cases and mortality apart from total death counts. But when you actually assess deaths from all causes year on year between 2019 and 2020 THERE ARE NO EXCESS DEATHS. They are lying. 

The same obtains in the UK and elsewhere - not that the true figures cannot be verified, they can - they just aren’t being - not by governments and not by media. 

One then has to stop asking if people are actually dying in India - of course they fucking are. Like they do every year by the thousands every week just like they do in the United States and every country on the planet. 

The difference now in the modern scaremongering media madness is that unlike ever before, they are reporting normal mortality rates through the media Week on week and in any ordinary year, over 55,000 people die in a week in the US alone but they are now calling it something else. They are claiming that covert is causing lots of those deaths. But when you actually add up the totals, no more deaths than usually occur are actually occurring. The false reassignment to covert is the real kicker especially when you consider that the people who would ordinarily die from a raft of conditions anyway (comorbidity) and they have now been tested with a procedure that has up to 96% inaccuracy (read: false positivity) then it’s easy to fudge the numbers and say covert was the culprit when it was actually regular flu or pneumonia or heart disease or cancer or just plain old age. And yet in the throes of the most deadly pandemic in modern times NO MORE PEOPLE ARE DYING THAN IS USUAL - EVEN IN FUCKING INDIA. 

I don’t claim to know where that footage was dredged up but what I do know with absolute conviction is that authorities do lie - Robert F Kennedy Sr quoted this truism during his lifetime and was, like his brother, engaged in going up against and exposing those corrupt authorities and look what happened to them. 

I’ve seen photos doing the rounds that looked like they could have been stock photos from the gas disaster on 7th May in India or even before that. It’s a tactic that’s oftentimes been employed to sensationalise a story. 

If anyone believes for a second that the collective governments and their captive sock-puppet medias wouldn’t employ deceptive tactics to further a particular agenda which might revolve around profiteering, population management and control, then they haven’t been paying attention. 

Frog, pot, gradually warming water - you do the math. 

It’s a crock of bullshit. 

If it wasn’t there would genuinely have been an increase in deaths to the tune of over 400,000 people in the US under Trump’s watch in 2020 - there weren’t and that is verifiable. 

The question we should be asking is not whether people are dying in India from a statistically non-lethal virus, it is why are we being lied to about all of this?

Throwing out the Trump with the bathwater

America (maybe around half of America, who knows any more?), your vitriolic antipathy toward Donald Trump is self-evident - I get that and I am not trying to convince you to change your opinion - you are most certainly entitled to it. But much of it seems to be founded on a personal grudge pertaining to his “undeserved” formative privilege and the demeanour presumptively associated with that.

I am not so much concerned with Trump-bashing or his behaviour, lack of social decorum or indeed how he got to where he got to as there are many first hand accounts one could cite that would torpedo your opinion of the man insofar as his base nature is concerned and to be honest, without knowing him personally and utilising the media as a yardstick for the measure of DJT, I think we would be all be reaching. 

It’s the easiest, laziest thing in the world to do - rely on questionable media “opinion” to form our own impressions and yet that is precisely what has occurred with Trump particularly throughout his presidency. 

No single deed or verbal expression has gone untainted by the Obamedia machine (Barack’s singular and lasting legacy - the championing of fake news - there are many more but that is truly the spikiest barb in his crown of thorns) when it comes to Donald Trump and even as his presence (supposedly) recedes in the wake of the puppet-presidency of Biden, any media associated with the former president is still unarguably tainted with blatant bias. 

What I would elect then to focus on, without regurgitating the White House rhetoric and floral language, (although I have posted a link should you be interested in reading what actually occurred during those 4 years) is the raft of events/policies/achievements/milestones - call them what you will, that did, in fact unarguably occur under the Trump Administration. 

And yes, I can easily pull apart the claims to greatness during the fake coronavirus pandemic and the steps implemented by the Trump Administration in promoting 5G, both of which initiatives are highly questionable, in my view. There are also some environmental policies I’d argue against but I am certainly with Trump on many of the big ticket items that had the farthest reaching impact on both America and the world, when it came to doing business, trade agreements and, in fact, environmental policies per-se. 

If I thought he got everything right that would fringe on blind sycophancy and believe me, I am no fan of the Trump demeanour and ego, nor of his oftentimes smug and smarmy delivery but if I was to judge everyone with whom I have worked and/or collaborated with and/or admired in certain ways over the years, I’d easily find fault with all of them.  

That one of the most bellicose presidents in recent memory (Barack Obama) can garner a Nobel Peace award over his successor who held fast in preventing or avoiding any wars whatsoever on his watch, speaks volumes to the power of the political obfuscation that obtained during the Obama years, a narrative that served to propagandise all that he touched and conversely taint any opposition as the fake-media paradigm took hold. When Trump assumed office, despite the media support (read: bias) Clinton enjoyed throughout that presidential campaign, the anti-Trump rhetoric ramped up unabated and has continued in that vein ever since to the point that nobody in America can place any legitimacy on the opinions of the mockingbird media and yet they still do, blindly and faithfully such has been the power of turning them against their last president. 

I say all of this, not as a Trump supporter, but as an objective observer from without the American pantomime as it has unfolded over the last decade or so. But to say these things merely sets one up to be branded a right wing conservative Trump supporter when I (and many others) am none of those things. I cherish liberalism, in the true sense of what it represents “freedom” as enshrined in various democratic constitutions and the right of individuals to that self-determination in every respect - not this reversal of those very tenets that are as far from liberal or free or democratic as one can get. Therefore ironically, there is arguably more innate freedom preserved within the ideals of many Republicans in America today than as demonstrated through the bias, hate-speech, censorship, vitriol and abject conservatism of the so-called Democrats who have taken the leftist ideal in rotation through 180º to end up on the opposite side of the political compass. Except, of course, where the elites are concerned - then and only then should those (with that privilege) enjoy proper rights of freedom and choice - it’s not the domain of the masses. And irony upon irony, those liberties and rights to self-determination are the very precepts that Trump has fought so hard for 4 years to protect - the democratic liberties of ordinary Americans. 

Biden, in his first few days of office, has nailed the Democrat colours to the mast in his swathe of executive orders that not only set out to simply overturn policies that Trump initiated (the blind ole Americans by dint of that fake news machine see anything that Trump did and being overturned as a positive move) regardless of the fact that it will crush state economies and jobs and further disenfranchise the working class Americans that Sleepy Joe promised he would look after....yeah, right.

In case anyone has forgotten, the very definition of “democracy” is a rule of the mob - the masses and their right to decide policy by majority. The fraudulent election made a mockery of that and the elitist hegemonic technocracy that obtains in the US hammers the final nails into that coffin too. The wobbly pen hand of Joe Biden as it sweeps across another executive order of federal overreach (something else Trump legislated to curtail) does not represent the will of the masses, the ordinary American, the most disenfranchised of the population - it squarely represents the will of the Deep State elitist cabal which is what this rabid press and acquiescent non-thinking Americans believe is the pathway to a better United States when all that they are really supporting is a Trump-free America which has to be better than one with him at the helm, right?

Wrong. So very wrong that it hurts and will continue to hurt until the pain that is brought to bear by this globalist technocracy reaches the point where those clamouring to rid themselves of the scourge of Donald Trump will realise they have just woken up in the pot of boiling water only they had no idea it was this hot or have any idea how it got to be that way.

I can tell you - because you elected to permit a patently fraudulent election, which you swept under the rug, to hold sway, which compromised the judiciary ensuring that it wasn’t challenged while this insane narrative was bolstered by the fatally biased mainstream and social media machine - all of these measures terminal symptoms of a dying democracy, which you, America deemed to be okay - that big picture - ridding yourselves of Trump - seemed more important than any old constitutional rights or tenets, at the time. 

Fact is, it wasn’t, it isn’t but it is done and, I do believe, so may America be - done. 

And you guys did this - not because of Donald Trump - but to spite him.

But it’s okay - Trump is out and that’s all that counts.... 

Never before in the history of the world can I see the metaphor of throwing the baby out with the bathwater being so emphatically valid.

But this, of course, is just my opinion.

Trump, a perspective. Snobbery?

This is not written as a Trump fan. It’s written simply as a Trump observer. 

It’s only when you have spent some time [and let’s be honest, it’s all some people have done for the last four years] listening to Trump detractors wax critical of everything this president, no, person [some still trot out the mantra: ‘he is not MY president’] represents to them without a single acknowledgement of anything he may have achieved in that time. And there has been much however that isn’t the point here. 

It’s easy to be critical. Of anything. It’s just lazy. It takes no effort at all. It also takes no objective or [ironically] critical thinking especially when the media is forming your opinions for you.

And, I have come to discover, much of Trump hatred is engendered within a blind snobbery. There is a large sector of America that simply cannot bear the idea that this boorish, uncouth bad hair day dude could be their president. It is embarrassingly beneath them. Hence the continued denial that he actually is. And, let’s be honest here, unlike Joe Biden, Trump actually is the president. Still. For now. 

Another thing the Trump bashing media takes pains to ignore while they ramp up the catch phrase “president elect” thereby planting it in the collective American psyche in hope that it will come to pass...

Based on the electoral college results, it should, of course, be a fait accompli but everyone downplays [most notably the mainstream media] the impending congressional session where the electoral college votes are ratified for a final time and where objections can be raised as to the legitimacy of these results. Any objections, if seconded [and Republicans could hold sway] then this election is far from over.

Any articles that do speculate on this dynamic, in the mainstream press, round firmly on the conclusion that this would be the last ditch act of a desperate man and would likely fail. It would represent the death throes of a loser unwilling to accept defeat. And that may be the eventual outcome but we would be disingenuous if we were to glibly proclaim this to have been a normal or seemingly ethical or logical election. 

Can we rely on that pathological hatred harboured by the anti Trumpers to have swung a seemingly landsliding [in Trump’s favour at the time] result overnight to render sleepy Joe Biden, not only a better ballot total than Barack Obama but the biggest win in US election history with apparently over 80 million votes?

Despite the flagrantly anomalous torpedoing of precedents by the most unlikely of candidates, the nation and its courts seem to have similarly dispensed with basic mathematics at the same time where 1.8 million and 2.5 million can apparently mean the same thing and nobody bats an eye.... So yes, folks, this situation IS unprecedented and I don’t discount a stormy congressional/senate undertaking in January when Mike Pence is tasked with proclaiming Trump a loser [or not....]. 

I wouldn’t want to call it. 

All I can say is that, like with COVID, there is something horribly fishy about the entire US election this time round and the US media, driven by anti Trump propaganda, are determined to ignore the big fat elephant in the voting booth who can’t tally votes yet is still believed. 

Come on, nobody [and I mean NOBODY] actually believes Biden is even remotely presidential material. Even less so than Trump ever was. The only conclusion must be that it wasn’t Biden’s fit or popularity that turned things around, it was the swing votes of all those who hate Trump that much. This even when the election was unarguably ramping up in Trump’s favour. 

One thing that must surely be questioned: during the claims of election fraud and ballot tampering and anomalous numbers....when any of these issues are scrutinised even in the most cursory way, not one single controversial ballot appears for Trump. Every single ballot after the night they purportedly stopped counting, was in favour of that scamp, Joe Biden. 

Funny that, huh?

I guess people really do hate Trump that much.

Or could it be they are just snobs?

Or maybe it was a bit dodgy after all...?

Can’t wait for January 6th when all will be settled once and for all...

Vegan Pigeon-Holing

I read a piece the other day (by an American vegan) pigeon-holing vegans as being almost exclusively right-leaning hipsters who supported the gun lobby and saw everything and anything leftist as conspiracy  and that as such these vegans also believed that plant-based living exempted them from infection as their immune systems were far superior to the rest of society and that those suffering from COVID-19 (sic) just needed to have a vegan immune system. She wrote this in a generic way which is as facile as saying that all the human omnivores on the planet are NOT tinfoil hat wearing conspiracy theorists and believe the official narrative of COVID because they are all of the same mindset. That’s just spurious horse shit I’m sure you’d agree.

And I don’t fit into her shoehorned categorisation of what this imagined cult of proselytising vegans are supposed to stand for.

For me it is very simple - I am a) not saying there isn’t a virus - I am saying that it hasn’t been isolated - but without that scientific standard on which to base the whole COVID narrative, it cannot be supported empirically in any way b) not advocating that all vegans are by default healthier than their meat-eating compatriots - not at all. Vegans eat all manner of shit and a whole heap of processed crap that is as unhealthy as anything anyone else eats (the meme here case in point but so what) - the premise of veganism is simple - it’s a lifestyle that involves no animal products. That’s it. It doesn’t thus by default propel vegans to an immediately higher realm of consciousness - that is a mistake that many who are in judgement of vegans for just being vegans, make and, it must be said, many vegans assume superiority as a result too. It isn’t good for the cause but I believe that needs to be taken up with each vegan as you meet them. Plant-based diets are, unarguably healthier than meat-rich and dairy-based lifestyles. Again, it doesn’t follow that farming only plants is going to save the planet (if one thinks it needs saving, of course) - what gets missed here is that the healthy and sustainable component comes in when a diet is largely organic as that is, without any doubt, the healthiest and most sustainable way for humans to exist. 

I have huge moral issues against people who wantonly and consciously don’t give a fuck about the knock-on effects of the meat and dairy industry and think that organically farmed meat and dairy products somehow benefit the animals - they don’t. They do however benefit the land and the human species. If one can avoid chemicalised, processed food - that is a no brainer but it doesn’t necessarily just pertain to plants. 

That’s where the simplistic viewpoint offered up by the author of the article I’m referencing, falls away as well - vegans, by default don’t just think their immune systems are healthier and in better shape because of veganism - it’s about the purity of the food that is being consumed but hey - if you’re a vegan pisshead who downs a litre of brandy every evening and are partial to some chemical recreation then it really doesn’t matter that you’re not partaking of flesh - your lifestyle will still take its toll on your immune system. 

The basis of good health management is avoiding that type of toxicity and plants alone don’t provide that - they have to be organic, non-contaminated plants that aren’t laced with glyphosate and other heavy metal toxins during the chemicalised factory farming process. 

Similarly, organically produced meat is far healthier than the GMO-fed, chemicalised mass produced product that most humans carnivores eat and probably synthesised, plant-based “meats”. 

So to just create this narrow band of vegan denialists, while it may apply to some vegans, it certainly isn’t a meaningful brush with which to tar all of us.

The other unarguable factor is what is delivered via vaccines by way of attrition as side-effects and using a very simple analogy - if vaccines were this optimal health-benefit then the most vaccinated population on the planet (Americans) would by default be the healthiest among us but in reality, they are among the unhealthiest of all the developed nations bar none and have the highest infant mortality rates and SIDS rates and allergy rates and and developmental disorders and autism rates and on and on - don’t believe me - check out the CDC website itself. 

By the same token, to lump the politics of veganism into this discussion is similarly just ridiculous. I, in the author’s opinion, am a right wing anti-liberal gun-loving conspiracy theorist who believes that by eating plants I have a claim to a superior immunity somehow....

How is there any relationship between my politics and my organic vegan lifestyle?

I believe in not harming animals and, for that matter humans - ergo: I never have and never will own a gun - I don’t believe in them. You get rid of every firearm on the planet and we’d be a long way toward pacifying the population. 

And the only reason one would be seen to be so-called “right wing” is simply by dint of the fact that these are the narrow parameters that our political landscape has been restricted to - you’re either a Republican or a Democrat - Labour or Tory and so it goes on - each so-called democracy deliberately perverted into a two-party system - not for our convenience but for ease of separation. Exactly what’s happening on the planet. 

So simply because I see through the hateful leftist (not my word) so-called liberal (it isn’t) media and its ownership by the Deep State machine, this automatically makes me anti this (correct) but it neither automatically makes me right wing, a Republican or Socialist nor by default, a Trump lover. But if the choice is boiled down to having only one choice to oppose the maniacs that have hijacked our health and media, then that’s the side on which one has to fall, warts and all.

I have sympathy for the writer and her husband who got sick, that sucks but it has nothing to do with vegan denialism or militancy - just everything to do with people simply getting sick in the same way two people from the same genetic background may each smoke 70 cigarettes a day for 20 years and one may develop cancer and die and the other not - but who knows what other factors are at play here that compromise health, not least of which may just be simply ongoing environmental toxicity - consumed over time. Exposure to 5G radiation, workplace toxic exposure and, of course - stress. 

It was, in short, a stupid article making quantum and paradigm leaps attempting, unsuccessfully to categorise a lifestyle choice into a socio-political one-size-fits-all analysis. That doesn’t work - not at all.

And many of the processed “plant” based alternatives don’t automatically presuppose healthier eating but by the same token, it’s not just about that - it’s about not harming other sentient beings - if we choose to eat shit and harm ourselves, that is still our prerogative - a choice - something that we deny the animals that we breed and abuse, traumatise and eventually murder. To me - that’s the point and it is a fundamentally flawed, selfish and immoral one.

CONSPIRACY is conspiracy - it’s never just a theory...

Conspiracy (in law: The crime of conspiracy consists in the agreement of two or more persons to do an illegal act, or to do a lawful act by unlawful means.)

For conspiracy to exist (as it does everywhere in the world and has done since man inhabited this planet) it doesn’t require the widespread cooperation of thousands of people sworn to secrecy, as has been conjectured in argument against anyone who might question an official narrative, it only requires for a handful of well-placed people who exert sufficient influence over policy, to concoct a plot and then set it in motion.

It’s the way hierarchies work and have done since time immemorial - the policy-makers occupy the narrow pinnacle at the peak of the pyramid, devise a plan and an ultimate endgame, rough this out and then issue instructions to the next echelon of the hierarchy (with the salient details withheld), which in turn devolves downward in ever diminishing detail through the ranks until the workers at the base of the pyramid structure carry out the actual deeds to move the plan along.

Do they have any clue as to the ultimate outcome desired by the upper handful? No, of course not but on analysis they are all working for this common goal and if one were to take a simplistic view of the organisation, one might by led to conclude that everyone was in on it - they’re not and this obtains in most organisational structures where businesses are concerned. 

Let’s expand this example into the current situation. 

Now let’s be clear here - there is a tiny fraction of people who control businesses across the planet, executives who sit on the boards of banks and industrial corporations and indeed, health and pharmaceutical corporations not least of which are the WHO and so-called regulatory bodies like the CDC. These organisations are not the sterile non-profit public interest bodies one might imagine they should be - far from it. They actually exist in a very profit-driven paradigm and derive a huge percentage of their income from medical patents, royalties and the sale of medicine and in particular, vaccines. This is readily accessible information.

But back to the Pyramid Corporation for a second where we have the most influential board members, owners and/or sponsors of governments (yep, they pretty much own the purportedly “elected” officials) financial, industrial and pharmaceutical, corporations as well as mainstream and social media platforms and who, without question, use (faux) philanthropy as another means to garner further profit from an already captive mass audience. 

Let’s assume for a moment that this handful of execs formulate a plan to generate massive profits and at the same time perhaps further another, more sinister end...

For example, the most powerful and influential tools at their disposal are those of media and public health. They have driven natural healing and medicine underground in favour of a purely science (sic) based allopathic model which creates an absolute dependence on their chemical creations (drugs) and in a repeat business version that ensures annuity income for each citizen’s life cycle and, as they own the governments and their systems of taxation, the death business too. 

This model is unassailably devious and clever - they own the research facilities - in fact, fund them so get to say who researches what and what the outcomes of that research should be. When anyone deviates from the program or diverts down a pathway that challenges the desired outcome, that person is usually shut down pretty quickly - people like Peter Duesberg, Kary Mullis and Judy Mikovits are but 3 immediately recognisable examples. People who were employed by these corporations, at the top of their game in their respective fields yet when, driven by the results of their research, called the official narrative into question , suddenly had their funding pulled, were character-assassinated by the very people who once held them in such high esteem and new charges were found to replace them. People like Anthony Fauci feature prominently in this narrative, on the wrong side of the chasm, of course. 

So if one controls the direction of medical research (which they do), they can manipulate the outcome of that research (which they do). All pharmaceutical corporations who supply drugs to the citizens of the US, for example, are convicted felons who have been responsible for scientific fraud, medical malpractice and have wittingly killed hundreds of thousands of Americans if not millions. They have actuarial personnel and departments tasked with running the numbers for medicines where the likely side-effects will result in a certain number of deaths, which will translate into lawsuits and possibly settlement payouts - these are weighed up against the profits that will be made and if the financial offset is sufficiently negligible, the drug (dangers fully known) will be launched on the public anyway. In a nutshell - the profits far outweigh the potential liability. 

These are the people who make the policy and they make the drugs, including the vaccines. And these are the people who indirectly supply the science that drives the WHO and who have stakes in the profits of that organisation to boot. They are unscrupulously deceitful from the get-go (their legal track record demonstrates that) and by dint of the fact that they hold the lion’s shareholding of the the global media (both mainstream and social) they broadcast a false narrative around the products they create and sell and particularly around the safety of those products. These profit driven felons seem to hold the trust of the public unswervingly. It is astonishing. 

Okay, so you have the drugs, you own the science and the published results, you have the media and the WHO in your pocket - all that is left to do is broadcast that there is likely - no hang on - definitely going to be a viral pandemic very soon, which will comprise a new coronavirus (something on which you unsurprisingly already hold patents) and the world will require to behave exactly as we are about to outline in this narrative that we called Event 201. 

While we are at it, the same group of influencers (during the 1980’s) launched the era of viral detection by means of antibody testing (more on that in a second) which basically meant that they could bamboozle the world in one fell swoop by using a new testing methodology (for which the same influencers would own the test kit royalties) to say that someone had tested positive for HIV... We must pause again here for a second and reread that statement: “Tested positive for HIV” now that sounds definitive right? Problem is - it absolutely is not. Not even close. 

In the first instance - the test did not test for viral particles in blood. It had to be the case as nobody had then or has since, ever isolated HIV (not even the illustrious Judy Mikovits, certainly not to Koch’s or Rivers’ standards) so they had to come up with this new fangled technique which went something like this: 

A) We don’t have a benchmark for the virus as it has never been isolated so we cannot find it in blood

B) Let us assume that certain antibodies that are present in immunocompromised individuals (fullblown AIDS patients, of which there were a few in the 1980’s) are specific to the virus as they are present in all of these AIDS patients

C) Let us say that if you have x amount of these antibodies (proteins) in your test sample, that you are HIV positive - in other words, if the antibodies are there, the virus must be there too right - otherwise why would these people be dying of AIDS?

D) Just to be safe and because we believe in the science being empirical (which it isn’t) let us run a second antibody test and if that is positive too, we will run a third confirmatory test using another antibody type protocol and then and only then if the third test is positive then the patient will be deemed to be HIV positive. If any one test through the series returns a negative result then the patient is HIV negative. 

Flawless right?

Well, no actually, very flawed indeed. First up (certainly in Africa) they stopped doing the second test very early on - I mean who could afford it and why bother if the poor old black dude tested positive in the first place - I mean he was just a poor African and we all know that black lives, especially African ones, are far less valuable than white ones...

In the second place, a raft of common conditions (again, especially in Africa) lit up the test with false-positives so there was no definitive way to say with any scientific certainty that anyone actually had the virus. Pregnancy, malaria, cholera, hepatitis, flu,  and around another 65 or so ailments completely unrelated to AIDS all rendered false-positives on the test. This was a way to rapidly build a very flawed infection database if these factors were being ignored (which they were). What it suggested, if anyone had bothered to do the math, was that when the immune system was under stress, certain exosomic responses occurred naturally and these regularly read as positives on the antibody test. 

Just to paint a detail in this picture demonstrating just how ridiculous this situation was - an antibody test result indicating a certain reading could be determined as being HIV positive in a Lab in Africa (it gets worse) but when that same test reading was (or is) sent to Australia or the US, it may very well be read as HIV negative. In other words, the test (sic) was totally interpretive, some in the real world might say, fickle or some others may tell the truth and say it was total bullshit. 

Later in rural Africa, diagnosis of HIV infection was done without any testing whatsoever - merely through examination and observation and if a patient exhibited certain symptoms and weight loss over a prescribed timeframe, he/she was diagnosed as being HIV positive. This, people, is not science - this is utter nonsense. Sadly, we bought it - well most of us and those who didn’t and spoke out about it - were shut  down. 

And so a pandemic was declared on the basis of this fatally flawed testing methodology when it was likely that as much as 80% of the people tested had no virus in them at all, much less HIV. But that didn’t stop the medical establishment saying they had AIDS and ultimately forcing treatment on them.

So phase 1 of convincing the world there was an infection problem was achieved. Done through a press conference announcement in 1984 not through any scientifically peer-reviewed published study but hey, why not. Their media made sure that went out on all the right wires and any dissent was rapidly crushed. People were too scared to question the science - I mean this was all new which is why they needed a new test too right? 

Phase 2 was establishing an infection database, which was done very successfully using the fatally flawed testing method described above, and a very hefty profit was made on the sale and distribution of these test kits globally. The money was really starting to roll in now.

Phase 3 - let’s get them some drugs. We have to announce that there is no cure for AIDS (let’s be honest - you can’t cure a virus you haven’t found yet) but everyone everywhere is working on a cure - more research (ramp up the interest - forget cancer, that’s old news) everyone was looking for a cure for AIDS - their media coverage was awesome - more sales, more profit, money rolling in - the AIDS industry was a goldmine. We have drugs, we have many drugs - these things called antivirals but as we called HIV a retrovirus, these will now be renamed antiretrovirals (sounds so grand and expensive and technical) and we shall un-mothball some chemotherapy (failed) cancer meds too and repackage these and give them to all of these dirty infected gay men everywhere. Enter the era of ARV’s and the introduction of AZT which killed tens of thousands of gay men across the planet. Watch the fatality curve when this is introduced - it goes off the charts - but wait, I hear you say, those men died of AIDS didn’t they? Well, that’s certainly what they wrote on their death certificates. But if you examine the real cause of death, they were systematically poisoned by AZT and usually died of liver failure such was the horrendous toxicity of the drug, even by its creator, Jerome P Horwitz’s own admission - he had shelved the drug for that very reason. No problem for gays and poor Africans though. The mainstream to this day ascribe enormous success to AZT as being the first “effective” drug for HIV treatment. If by killing gay men in droves is the measure of success then - hey, fair enough. 

And let’s be very honest here - the profits from the drugs were truly off the charts, now real money was rolling in. Billions of dollars annually. 

And if you were to ask the owners of those drug empires if they regretted losing a few million gay men and some worthless Africans - they’d say, not at all, if they were totally honest. I mean, these are the guys that run the profitability numbers on deaths versus litigation payouts and the numbers were very good indeed - especially if you controlled the narrative. Which they did and continue to do. 

What could have happened in any random scenario in LA or in Africa, however, was that if someone with, say hepatitis or malaria had tested positive (sic) on an Elisa antibody test (the so-called HIV test) then instead of screaming “HIV POSITIVE!” these people could simply have been treated for the ailment which lit up the test in the first place, placed on immune-boosting food, supplements and/or vitamins and instructed where possible to alter their lifestyle, which, in the case of the original AIDS victims - fast-track homosexuals primarily on the west coast of the US - could’ve been readily achieved. Not so simple though if you’re a crushingly poor African villager living in squalor with no decent potable water, no waterborne sewage systems and the effects of poverty, poor diet and disease all around you. These conditions lead very rapidly to immunocompromisation and we all know the immune responses were instrumental in causing many false positives on these ridiculous tests. And so the train of iatrogenicide ran on relentlessly. 

And if you check the worldwide death for AIDS stats (which are spurious in the extreme, of course) you will find that statistically heterosexuals do not get AIDS, not even sex workers and white heterosexual women are the unlikeliest of all, which is pretty selective for a randomly sexually-transmitted virus wouldn’t you say. Not so, for poor African women though - they were statistically more likely to return a positive reading - gee, I wonder why?

And so the AIDS train ran on...

Pause - so far it would only take the few in the know at the upper echelons of the base corporation to steer their pet scientists and the media in one direction. The medical establishment per-se (no disrespect) is merely the retail outlet for the already “established science” when, in fact the real statement here should be: the dictates of the “scientific establishment” as the science in the case of HIV has never been established no matter what that mainstream may deign to tell you. 

And once the momentum has been gained, it’s usually just routine to trot out the old rebuttal chestnuts when real journalists and scientists point out the flaws in the HIV=AIDS paradigm, like: “the science is settled” “conspiracy theorists” “tin-foil hat wearing idiots” etc. Hunt them in packs, through the media, deaths threats, ruin their careers, ridicule and ostracise them - very easy to do when you own the media and the the politicians who masquerade as policy-makers. 

But when people like Kary Mullis (remember him from a few paragraphs back?) win a Nobel Prize for his invention, Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) analysis then it should demonstrate that he’s no fool regardless of his leisure activities (the mainstream elect to use his eccentric lifestyle and openly admitted recreational drug use as a means to try and disingenuously discredit him). Mullis tried unsuccessfully for several decades, up until his death in 2019, to locate the paper or any study that empirically demonstrated that HIV was “the probable cause of AIDS” - he never found that document though it wasn’t for lack of trying. An additional crucial piece of information about Mullis and PCR - he said on more than one occasion that it should NOT be used for diagnostical determination of viruses nor for measuring viral load. He said that.

So now that that picture has been painted - it amply demonstrates how over a relatively short period of time, a scenario can be established utilising flawed science and media control to determine a spectacularly high repeat profitability year on year.

What is even more concerning is that this slipped largely unnoticed under the general public’s radar. And why not? The public has an innate trust of authoritarian assertions particularly when public health is concerned so if people are indeed dying and these happen to be mostly gay men and impoverished Africans, it stands to reason that what has been said regarding sexual transmission of a virus (which nobody has ever proved) and eventual death by opportunistic infection when the immune system shuts down is exactly what’s happening - then why question it? Why question the drugs? Why question their motives?

Well, I would draw the reader to the opening gambit where it has been unarguably established that the pharmaceutical companies making these drugs (all of them) are convicted felons who hold much more regard for profit (particularly repeat profit) than they ever will for public health or curatives - the latter being totally counterintuitive to their very raison-d’être - sickness management and repeat business. 

Fast forward to 2020 and we find that there is a demonstrably superior model for this year - no longer will the target audience be restricted to gays and poor Africans - that model was certainly viable but how would one target the entire population without killing too many of them and still retain the repeat business with a few sweeteners thrown in? 

What better way than some form of the common cold? 

Enter SARS-COV-2 and here we are. This could prove to be the ultimate conspiracy for conspiracy it most certainly is. 

The HIV scam was the proof-of-concept experiment that paved the way for a lead-in to Event 201 which set the tone for the chaos that was to ensue. Very specifically organised chaos, it must be said.

With the public trust in the authoritarian medical science that had been established with AIDS and antibody testing which had become an accepted modality for testing for virus (even though it never has), the world was poised for the new grand scale social engineering event. 

You do not need a particularly virulent virus at all for there to be widespread impact, not when you own the narrative and have already warned people this is coming. And knowing human nature the way we do, so many people thrive on the drama and fear the worst. Remember, they had a testing methodology that was demonstrably inaccurate and could be shown to be lit up by naturally occurring immune-responses and flu, colds etc. so even if the public questioned the figures when they cottoned on to the falsely attributed deaths (the WHO came up with a doozie to cover that one), the more people that were tested, the more false-positives that would occur so there again was the perfect model to assert a second wave of infection when nobody was actually sick and the whole planet had attained natural herd immunity months before. 

I don’t know how else to paint this picture to demonstrate how simple it actually is to create a pandemic, ramp up fear, control the population and garner obscene profits into the bargain - while setting everyone up for the coup-de-grâce - the global vaccine that isn’t and never has been necessary but is being dangled as the sword of Damocles - you won’t be allowed to live a normal life unless you are vaccinated. This pertaining to a supposed virus with a better than 99.8% recovery rate. They simply cannot manipulate the numbers any longer - it’s all falling apart so they have to resort to the trickery of ramping up numbers with the tests to say - “see, it hasn’t gone away - we still need a vaccine!”

We really don’t and it HAS gone away - it went away a long time ago - was done and dusted within a couple of months even at its supposed epicentre at Wuhan and Sweden as well as Japan (no lockdowns) flattened their curve within the same timeframe despite scathing criticism through that Pharma-owned sock-puppet media. 

Just because the word “conspiracy” gets unpacked every time a person (oftentimes a very educated person) questions an unarguably spurious narrative, even if it has been “accepted” by populist consensus, doesn’t make that person wrong and it would be extremely naive to think that conspiracy in the legal sense of the word - “plots by more than one person to act by unlawful means” doesn’t happen - it is a way of doing business - everywhere and no more so than by the felonious pharmaceutical industry whose love of profit is self evident.

If, however, as Robert F Kennedy Jr says, they are prepared to kill thousands of Americans and ride the lawsuits to turn a buck then why would we think when it comes to vaccines (where they don’t even have to safety test) they have suddenly found Jesus and wouldn’t lie to us about them?

Come on, folks - do the math. 

Have a look round at the people who haven’t succumbed to any virus this flu season despite the establishment’s best efforts and ask yourself if this is such a bad disease then how come you have to go for a test to find it when people aren’t even sick? 

I don’t think there is anything much else to say about this situation other than it’s about time we took our lives and our planet back.

I’m not really into the whole Q-Anon phenomenon but that’s certainly what it is - what I will predict, however, is that when Trump regains the presidency in November, I think there’s a very strong possibility that COVID-19 will rapidly die soon thereafter. 

Let’s wait and see, shall we...

Maybe Trump is an alien...